Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
If many children don't meet strict asylum criteria but face significant dangers if they return, the United States should consider allowing them to stay using humanitarian parole procedures we have employed in the past, for Cambodians and Haitians. It may be possible to transfer children and resettle them in other safe countries willing to share the burden.
What is the author's purpose in this excerpt? to express an opinion about US asylum policies to prompt feelings of sympathy in the reader to suggest a suspenseful atmosphere about the asylum process to provide facts and details about Cambodian and Haitian children
Answer:
to express an opinion about US asylum policies
Explanation:
The text shows how the United States has a duty to take responsibility for immigrant children who do not meet the guidelines for staying in asylums, but are at great risk of life when sent back to their countries of origin. "Returning" these children can be tantamount to handing them over to death, so the United States, as a country with resources and a stable economy, must take responsibility for these children, on an ethical basis.
This is the author's opinion on asylum policies in the USA.
