Answer:
Irony.
Explanation:
Irony is the literary device that refers to the use of words to express one thing by using the opposite or words contrary to the literal meaning. In other words, the irony is when one thing is said but it means the opposite thing.
In his "De Oratore", Cicero states that <em>"dissimulation [is] the humor of saying one thing and signifying another, which steals into the minds of men in a peculiar manner, and which is extremely pleasing when it is well managed, not in a vehement strain of language, but in a conversational style."</em> And in this expression, the phrase "saying one thing and signifying another" refers to the literary device of irony.
On April 4, 1968, Presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy spoke to an audience that had gathered as part of a political event. However, earlier that day, Martin Luther King Jr. had been assassinated. Kennedy then made a speech addressing the tragic news.
- The central idea of this speech is that of unity among the people of the nation. Kennedy argues that, as Martin Luther King was most likely killed by a white person, black people might be inclined to feel angry and betrayed, and to hate whites. He asks them not to feel that way, as the best path to follow from now on is that of unity.
- I think it is an effective eulogy because it addresses the main concerns that were going to arise after the assassination, such as the future of the civil rights movements and the people's reactions to the news. It does not spend much time on King's personal life, but celebrates his public actions.
- It honoured Dr. King because it highlighted the main objectives of King's campaigns. Kennedy reminded attendants that the fight for civil rights was not one of hate, but of equality, peace and collaboration. He also pointed to the extreme sadness and despair that the country was feeling, but gave them a way forward.
Answer:
I think it's A.
it's not C because kids cannot make their own meals. We also know it's not d because article is talking about fruits.
Answer:
Liaugminas puts "experts" and "news analysts" in quotation marks because she doesn’t believe that they are experts and news analysts.
Explanation:
She is ironic in this excerpt where she says:
<em>"Do you hear from the same set of “experts” again and again? I find this especially annoying; The newsmagazine I worked for is still using some of the same old liberal “news analysts” they used when I first arrived in the Midwest bureau more than two decades ago."</em>
She says about how news selects subjects and how they cover them; they are not objective, and they have lost their core values.
