1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Karo-lina-s [1.5K]
2 years ago
13

The Karsas-Nebraska Act of 1854 differed from the 1820 Missouri Compromise by stating that the slave status of a testimited into

the Union would be determined by
History
1 answer:
tino4ka555 [31]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Popular sovereignty

Explanation:

The Missouri Compromise kept the amount of slave states and free states balanced in America. However, the Kansas-Nebraska Act reapeled the Missouri Comp. because it allowed the states to decided if they wanted to be slave or free based on popular sovereignty.

You might be interested in
Please help me! :(
suter [353]

Answer:A

Explanation: because it seemed like it would be easier to do so

5 0
2 years ago
What are some reasons that government corruption occurs? did any aspects of the harding administration contribute to the scandal
nordsb [41]

In a general sense, corruption occurs due to human imperfection. Governments are as imperfect as the humans who create them. More specifically corruption occurs when the general, public interest is in a conflict with private or individual interests. Unfortunately, it is extremely easy for many types of government to become corrupt and democratic republicanism is not the exception. It usually happens when powerful individuals enter government in order to further their own agendas in detriment of the public good. Most of these men regroup in order to strengthen their position and bribe or silence those who oppose them. They manipulate public opinion with the help of other financially powerful groups and encourage policies and the creation of laws that advance their own profits while causing harm to the overall constituents. Sometimes the corruption is ideological and usually is both. Most times, ideological reasons are actually a façade for plain and simple greed and power hunger which is more pathological than intellectual.

With regards to the Harding Administration, domestic policy was very similar to the domestic policies of the current administration. Harding did not indulge in nepotism but in cronyism, which is sort of “<u>nepotism for friends</u>”.  As a business man in Ohio he had built an extensive network of friends within his own company and other companies. This allowed him to organize with them to further their own interests. The fact that he controlled a journal was also part of the issue as he used his journal to shape public opinion at the state and local level. When he became president of the USA, he brought with him many friends that he appointed in several positions of power in the federal government and his cabinet. Some of them turned out to be quite efficient and respected but many others were quite mediocre and belonged to Harding’s business circles back in Ohio. The best example of this is the Teapot Dome Scandal. Where members of his cabinet were Harding’s Secretary of the Interior Albert Bacon Fall was convicted of taking bribery from oil companies yet no oil company executive was ever convicted for the bribery. This person was part of what was then called The Ohio Gang.


6 0
3 years ago
What was Grant's main strategy during his Overland Campaign, to help work toward the defeat of the Confederacy?
vovangra [49]

Answer: 1. He believed that the capture of Richmond would ever the war.

I hope this would help you shorty.

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is NOT true of feudalism? Question 4 options: It established a vast trading network with the Far East. It
Firdavs [7]

Answer:

The first option is not true about feudalism. The reason: West and Central Europe had large distribution networks even before X century. Besides, during XVIII-XI centuries, social mobility among some regions of Europe was not common.

In addition to that, the Crusades and the subsequent conflicts in Middle-East changed some of the of the commercial dynamics during Middle Age. Furthermore, in Central Asia, the end of the Mongol Empire in XIII century and the ottoman expansion helped to the closure of the Silk Road, which was the biggest commercial route between Far East and Europe.  

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
2-How was Naples different from the other Italian city-states?
liq [111]
C-It did not have a large professional middle class.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What's the difference between Temperance and prohibition
    9·2 answers
  • What resolution to the problem does Gandhi offer, encouraging his fellow Indians to do the same?
    7·2 answers
  • What are Cliesthenes reforms??
    5·2 answers
  • If you had been in the audience, how would you have responded to Henry’s speech?Why?
    14·1 answer
  • Who invented the first computer?
    7·2 answers
  • How were representatives chosen for the House of Burgesses?
    7·2 answers
  • A reason Spanish conquistadors went to the Americas during the 1500s was to..
    10·1 answer
  • PLZ HELP
    6·2 answers
  • describe one of the main causes of world war 1 and explain how that cause led to the outbreak of the war
    11·1 answer
  • Do you recall?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!