Agriculture and textile factories impacted the economic development of South Carolina in several ways:
i) The textile industries and factories that had emerged before the civil war became very important in the history of South Carolina. There was a ready supply of raw materials, and change of attitude towards the development of industry which led to the growth of textile industries in South Carolina.
ii) The emergence and growth of agricultural and textile industries led to urban development and the rise of the population through migrant migration and a natural increase due to increased food production.
iii) growing of rice led to most of South Carolina's economic success through the rise of rice milling factories that utilized water power drive pestles.
iv) During the civil war, the textile and agricultural factories industry operated to capacity supplying uniforms and weapons leading to revenue growth and economic development.
Answer:
B) It allowed for the rise of independent political groups and practices in the British colonies.
Explanation:
Prime minister Robert Warpole introduced the policy of salutary neglect in order to ease restrictions and regulations, such as trade laws. By doing so, he found this a good initiative to make Britain focus on Europe's politic affairs and eventually become a world power. The measure was a success on one side, since American colonies were now able to trade with other countries apart from Britain, investing their earnings in goods made by the British, and supplying them with raw material. But on the other, the colonies began to achieve their political and economic independence, which eventually would lead to revolution.
<span>Buchanan believed that slavery was wrong while also claiming that states did not have the right of succession. As the North and South adamantly debated whether slavery was illegal and immoral or legal and ethical, Buchanan admitted that there were certain grievenances that would make the succession justified, but then he condemed the act of slavery, saying that it was unconstitutional adn that the Founder Fathers never intended to endow any group of people with the right to enslave another group of people. But in a surprising turn, he said that if the succession was renamed to be called a revolution, then it would be acceptable because then, it would fail to call for the enforcement of a constituional right, and it also seperated the government from the requirement of giving the succession recognition. So in effect, Buchannan hindered the succession by declaring the right to a secession to be null and void, but failed to denouce slavery because he also defended the excuses that the sourtherns were using to threaten the secession in the first place. The postition he took angered both the people of the North and South. In the end, the Battle of Fort Sumter commenced and the South excercised their right to sucession after all.</span>