Well i CANT do anything to help you here you do not have any thing for info please make another one because im very confused
Answer:
rikki tikki tavi was a really good story the important details is the story of a brave young mongoose who keeps a human family and a number of animal friends safe from the vicious, murderous cobras who slither through the garden.
Answer:
Dont waste your points over this please
Explanation:
Question:
"<em>These natural laws are incontrovertible; . . . Those who resist them will be wiped out. Biology not only tells us about animals and plants, but also shows us the laws we must follow in our lives, and steels our wills to live and fight according to these laws. The meaning of all life is struggle.
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>The excerpt above is an example of a false dilemma. Which of the following choices explains the logical fallacy in this excerpt, as well as the reason it fails to prove its point?"</em>
I think your answer would be:
- D. The excerpt contains no logical fallacies but uses true statements to persuade the audience of life’s common struggle.
The correct option would be <span>Nobody’s
In this case, the IS contraction is used and so the meaning of the sentences does not change. it is still expressing a future reference.
it is important not to get confused with the possessives (´s) otherwise this sentences would not have a clear meaning e.g Nobadys´.
Nobodys´s and nobodys are not grammatically correct options. so they should be discarded at once.
</span><span>
</span>