1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zlopas [31]
3 years ago
7

In the 1870s, the US government took a new approach to American Indians by

History
2 answers:
Paul [167]3 years ago
5 0
The answer is C Confining tribes on reservations
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]3 years ago
4 0

A: providing allotments of land.

The Dawes Act, also known as the General Allotment Act, authorized the President of the United States to survey Native American tribal land and divide it into allotments for individual Native Americans. Those who accepted the allotments and lived separately from the tribe would be granted United States citizenship.

The objectives of this Act were to abolish tribal and communal land ownership of the tribes into individual land ownership rigths in order to transfer lands under Native American control to white settlers and stimulate assimilation of them into mainstream American society., and thereby lift individual Native Americans out of poverty.

You might be interested in
How did marbury v. madison illustrate the supreme court's power of judicial review?
Leno4ka [110]
It did not establish judicial review. Judicial review had been used in state courts and lower federal courts prior to Marbury, and ruled a number of times that some laws were unconstitutional. In fact, even the Supreme Court used judicial review before Marbury to decide that a carriage tax was constitutional (Hylton v. United States). 

However, Marbury was the first case that the Supreme Court used to rule a law unconstitutional. They declared that a part of the Judiciary Act of 1789 which gave the US Supreme Court court original jurisdiction over writs of mandamus. The Court ruled that Congress does not have the authority to modify the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction, therefore, it was unconstitutional.

<span>In a way, by doing so, the Supreme Court actually took away some of it's power that Congress had granted it because the Constitution did not grant Congress that power.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the goal of missionaries​
Drupady [299]

Answer:to spread religios word and teachings!

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
In furman v. georgia, 1972, the court ruled that
Nadya [2.5K]
The answer is A. A helpful website for court case rulings is Oyez.com
6 0
3 years ago
Why should we learn about Native American Diversity? What impact does it have on America today?
lesya [120]
No :))))))))))))))))))
5 0
3 years ago
Both Cesar Chavez and Martin Luther King, Jr. used __________ protests to support their causes. A. violent B. nonviolent C. trea
telo118 [61]
A.violent is the answer
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was Tocquevilles concern with individual in america
    6·1 answer
  • What is one of the main powers of the majority party in both houses of Congress?
    6·2 answers
  • Why was the league of nations rejected by the united states
    5·2 answers
  • Explain how Jim Crow laws circumvented the intent and meaning of the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments
    13·1 answer
  • The explorers who tried to find a passage to the east by sailing around South America included all of the following except A Mag
    10·1 answer
  • How did West African slavery differ from the kind of slavery that developed in the Americas?
    10·2 answers
  • What methods did Cavour and Bismarck use to unite Italy and Germany
    13·2 answers
  • The Quran has specific guidelines for all of the following except
    11·2 answers
  • How did the first emperor of china forcibly unit the state of china under one empire?
    13·2 answers
  • What was George Washington’s farewell address
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!