Answer:
A trench war or position war is a war in which both parties have buried themselves opposite each other in trenches and other fortified positions, with the aim of stopping the advance of the enemy, which has resulted in a stalemate in which neither party succeeds through the enemy lines to break. In fact, a trench war is a situation where both sides besiege each other. Normally in the case of a siege there is an attacking party besieging the defending party, but in a trench war both parties are besiegers and besieged at the same time.
The best known trench war is the First World War (1914-1918), but wars such as the Civil War (1861-1865) and the Russian-Japanese War (1904-05) also exhibited characteristics of trench wars.
Nowadays trench wars only occur in the Third World, where the warring parties have modern firearms but hardly any vehicles such as tanks and planes. In the conflicts between Ethiopia and Eritrea at the end of the 20th century, trench wars were also waged.
Answer:
On April 18, 1775, British troops march out of Boston on a mission to confiscate the American arsenal at Concord and to capture Patriot leaders Samuel Adams and John Hancock, known to be hiding at Lexington. ... Two lanterns were hung, and the armed Patriots set out for Lexington and Concord accordingly. Paul Revere was instructed by the Sons of Liberty to ride to Lexington, Mass., to warn Samuel Adams and John Hancock that British troops were marching to arrest them
Explanation:
Answer:
Article Two
Explanation:
Given that the Presidency is the Executive branch of government and the federal level and Executive branch roles and responsibilities are fully described by Article Two of the United States Constitution, therefore, the correct answer to the question is ARTICLE TWO.
Also, this statement was made by Richard Nixon the 37th President of the United States between 1969 to 1974.
Many reasons... First of all they should not have involved the United States of America, even Hitler knew that to win a war, you don't involve the Americans, you can even find quotes of Hitler talking about that. Even the Admiral in charge of the attack on Pearl Harbor knew it was a horrible idea "I can run wild for six months … after that, I have no expectation of success".
Other than involving the Americans, the Japanese should've attack up into the USSR (Russia) opening up a new front and forcing the Russians to move man power to their east.
Another is that Japan often ignored their German allies when they advised against certain campaigns and attacks, which were strategically horrid ideas.
Also, nukes.
One of the reasons why the Indian Removal Act was more expensive than the government had planned was that "<span>The Seminole people resisted and cost the government money in war costs", although there was moving costs related to this issue as well.</span>
