The position that the strict constructionists take in the
early years under the constitution is that the congress had the power of which
only listed in the article 2, section 8, and clause 1-17. Whereas the liberal constructionists
would have their congress to stench their power with the use of the elastic
clause, known as clause 18.
Checks and Balances. The Constitution divided the Government into three branches: legislative, executive, and judicial. ... Just like the phrase sounds, the point of checks and balances was to make sure no one branch would be able to control too much power, and it created a separation of powers.
No it does not make the country more democratic
The statement "Kersaint owned plantations and other property in the French Caribbean"does not called for an immediate abolition of slavery.
<h3>Who is
Armand-Guy Kersaint?</h3>
He was a sailor and politician who held an important naval posts during the early stages of the French Revolution.
Hence, the true statements about Armand-Guy Kersaint during the Napoleon French includes:
- he advocates for encouraging the willing migration of Africans to French colonies rather than their enslavement.
- he had participated in military campaigns against the British in the Caribbean and during the American Revolution.
- he called for abolishing the traditional privileges of the French nobility in France and its colonies.
Therefore, the Option D is correct.
Read more about Napoleon French
<em>brainly.com/question/361806</em>