Answer:
yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
Explanation:
Answer:
Yes, I agree with Mack's argument because he was able to clarify and give enough evidence on how reading Shakespeare is similar to that of studying the real world and our own selves. It also emphasizes the integrity of the heart and mind and how such unity makes a person understand and become educated.
Explanation:
The question above is related to Michael Mack's argument <em>"Why Read Shakespeare?" </em>He provided evidence regarding the good side of reading the works of Shakespeare. For him, although <u>reading Shakespeare's works may seem hard at the start, reading it over and over again will allow the person to grasp its true meaning.</u> He also compared it to that of studying different courses in college and learning to play a particular music.
The type of context that is different for both these two children is the social context.
<h3>What is Context?</h3>
In literature, context may be defined as the setting within which a work of writing is situated. It provides clarity and respective meaning to the intended message.
Social context illustrates the physical environment around us that can influence the way we behave and think literally.
The context of this question illustrates the situation of two different children from two different family backgrounds. One is living in an urban area with six older siblings, while the other is the only child living in a rural area.
Therefore, the type of context that is different for both these two children is the social context.
To learn more about Social contexts, refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/4066509
#SPJ1
The answer is C that's the only one that makes sense and the context clues help with the meaning
