Most credit Britain's faster industrialization to it's easy access to large quantities of coal. Many of the steam engines developed in that time were invented to pump out water of mines to get more coal. Many historians also credit the entrepreneurial spirit that was at first unique to England due to a common idea that wealth was infinite and could be created; however, in France Wealth was seen as finite and had to be taken from someone else in order to attain it. Mix these two key factors with Britian's colonies which it used as forcibly secluded markets for English products and they industrialized very rapidly. At the same time they expanded different types of transportation and expanded both canals and the roads in the British Isles to move more products.
Answer:
a
Explanation:
a. citizen participation in lawmaking
Answer:
it dividing the government into the three branches
Explanation:
this should be the correct answer picke me brailiest
For Germany the Treaty of Versailles meant harsh "reparations", a diminished land holding, and war guilt, since almost every nation blamed Germany for the outbreak of war. These reparations, however, proved to do more harm than good, since they humiliated Germany and made Germans far more aggressive in re-building their military and beginning World War II.
Answer:
The correct answer is B. It is not true that the Plessy v. Ferguson case paved the way for the Little Rock 9 to attend Central High School.
Explanation:
Plessy v. Ferguson was a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court in 1896 that ruled on the constitutionality of the right of the states of the Union to impose racial segregation in public places under the "separate but equal" doctrine.
The court decided, by 7 votes to 1, to declare that segregation in the southern states did not violate the Constitution (in particular the 14th Amendment which stated that all citizens were equal before the law). Judge Henry Billings Brown, speaking for the majority that approved the decision, said that the segregation done in the state of Louisiana did not imply inferiority, in the eyes of the law, of African Americans and that the separation by race in public places and services was a mere political issue. The dissenting voice within the Court, Judge John Marshall Harlan, strongly condemned his colleagues and said that this decision would be as negatively striking as the "Dred Scott Case". He added that the law of the United States did not state that the country had a caste system, that the constitution did not see the color of its citizens' skin and that everyone was equal under the law. Several jurists agreed with Harlan and the nation was divided over it. The southern states, however, rejoiced that their system of segregation by race now had a legal basis to support itself.
