Answer:
All data are unknown with decision making under uncertainty.
Explanation:
There are various assumptions used by a LP allocation problem and they are; any return from an allocation is not dependent of other allocations; it is possible to compare returns from varying allocations; total returns equals the sum of all returns that all the activities yielded. The only option that is not an assumption used by a LP allocation problem is "All data are unknown with decision making under uncertainty."
Answer:
same as the Explanation.
Explanation:
It was a huge change to switch from a religion based society in the Middle Ages to a people based society in the Renaissance. During the Renaissance, humanism effected political philosophy, art and religious change. First, political philosophy was severely changed during the Renaissance due to humanism.
Communication during the Renaissance experienced many changes, some of which significantly transformed European culture and lifestyle. The two most obvious contributions were the printing press and the development of secular art.
The printing press allowed books to be more widespread, which increased literacy. It also allowed for the development of newspapers, which informed people of the activities of the government, increasing accountability. Moreover, it made Bibles more widespread, which was influential in the development of new branches of Christianity.
Secular art, particularly in the form of frescoes, also became an important medium of communication. Frescoes often depicted historical figures or events. They also told stories of Greek mythology. This allowed the common citizen to increase his or her general knowledge.
Answer:B
Explanation:Pioneer species are hardy species that are barren due to fire so pioneer species has to occur first,then soil formation before plant growth.If the soil does not reform ,there is no way plant growth can occur.
A careful reading of the history of the “idea” of family preservation as well as an appraisal of the recent policy context for its adoption—as illuminated by Berry (1997), Schorr (1997), McCroskey and Meezan (1997), and others—suggests that all three explanations—dissensus on values, practice lacunae, and organizational complexities—may to a degree be valid. At a minimum, these and other trenchant commentaries such as those provided recently by Littell and Schuerman (1999) and Halpern (1999) suggest that any discussion of the “practice” of family preservation absent its historical/valuative roots and current organizational and policy context will be incomplete.
That said, this present paper will focus on some of the most vexing challenges of implementing family preservation practice, some of its enduring legacies as a practice modality, and some of the longer range problems in developing practice theory and application that it has illuminated
