1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
liq [111]
3 years ago
13

What does Jimmie mean that it wasn’t common courtesy for a friend to come to one’s home and ruin one’s sister?

English
1 answer:
frutty [35]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

He means that it was rude and wrong.

Explanation:

Common courtesy refers to something that is generally suggested and expected behavior.  By saying that it is not common courtesy he is using a humorous way of saying that the "friend" did something wrong.

You might be interested in
Use of everyday language but with different meanings shows up most frequently in _____.
Katyanochek1 [597]
Use of everyday language but with different meanings shows up most frequently in slang speech.

This would be known to be slang because yes its every day, but its not proper English and there's also different meanings.

Your answer: Slang
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In lines 840–851, what are Creon and Haemon arguing about? What prejudices does Creon reveal, and what do they tell you about Cr
Semmy [17]

answerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

explanation

5 0
2 years ago
Choose the best revision, if one is needed.
Anna [14]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

no change

3 0
3 years ago
Was the argument put forth by the plaintiffs valid? check all of the correct boxes.
aliya0001 [1]

The correct answer are

B) The premises are likely to be true.

C)  The premises reinforce, or support, the conclusion.

D) The conclusion follows logically from the premises.

When the premises serve to support the conclusion's accuracy and effectiveness in a reasonable manner, the argument is said to be valid.

Options B, C, and D would all be acceptable arguments presented by the plaintiffs. Because there is a risk that they may be erroneous as well (as in inductive reasoning).

"The premises are likely to be true," Because the premises and conclusion are inversely related if the premises support the conclusion, it is regarded as true, and if not, the opposite is true.

Because the conclusion follows the premises logically, it is also known as a chain of reasoning. As a result, answers B, C, and D are appropriate.

Learn more about plaintiffs

brainly.com/question/7315287

#SPJ4

Correct Question

Was the argument put forth by the plaintiffs valid? Check all of the correct boxes.

A) The premises are not true all of the time.

B) The premises are likely to be true.

C)  The premises reinforce, or support, the conclusion.

D) The conclusion follows logically from the premises.

5 0
1 year ago
Answer my question that I posted plz it’s important really important answer the multiple choice one thx
Lynna [10]

Answer:

ok

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • But the influence of children goes further than its first trifling effort of remaking heaven and earth. It forces us actually to
    7·2 answers
  • What did Athena advise Prometheus to add to the creatures in order to bring them to life?
    15·1 answer
  • What are the "benefits of failure" according to Rowling? why do you think she discusses these?​
    8·1 answer
  • What is the plot sequence in Hamadi
    9·1 answer
  • The term semantics is delivered from the Greek word semantikos, which means
    14·1 answer
  • 3.<br> I am one who loved not wisely but too well.<br> Othell<br> Figure of Speech:
    9·1 answer
  • Using suffixes, what would you call someone from New York and from California,
    9·1 answer
  • PLS ANSWER ASAPPPPPPPPPPP
    7·2 answers
  • I need help finding the right answer
    10·2 answers
  • What is the <br> evaluation criteria
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!