Answer:
a war that is unrestricted in terms of the weapons used, the territory or combatants involved, or the objectives pursued, especially one in which the laws of war are disregarded.
Explanation:
Rosetta Stone, think of the modern language course
The Founding Fathers of the US included provisions for amending the Constitution so that it can adapt as American society changes. This group of men realized that America was going to constantly change. This is why in the preamble of the Constitution they included the fact that they were making the Constitution in order to form a "more perfect union." This phrasing indicates the the current laws they have are not perfect and that they may need to be changed later on. This is why the Founding Fathers made it so that the Senate and House of Representatives could make changes to the Constitution.
He was making a commentary on the political division in the country.
Yes. Just so you know, I'm only in 11th grade, so I might not be using the right vocab, but I'll try my best.
It can be justified the same way that it was during the Korean War. In order to repel communism in South Korea, the US troops were launched. This was a unilateral military action. In the same way that the US used the Monroe Doctrine to help aid and enforce their rule in other places, this is what happened during the Iraqi War. The US saw an unjust system of government reigning unfairly, so they intervened to overthrow it. The justification there was that they should have been able to choose their own government (in short, they should have a fair and free democracy).
