The Americans had little to no training and very limited supplies.<span />
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, the best option would be that the US waited for approval from world leaders before retaliating, since instead the US took a unilateral approach. </span>
Answer:
The different leaders at the Paris Peace Conference after the first World War each had different goals based on how their countries fared in the war and their ideas for the future.
President Woodrow Wilson of the United States ⇒ lasting peace and justice
President Wilson wanted lasting peace and justice after the war which led him to propose his famous ''14 points''.
Prime Minister Orlando of Italy ⇒ territories promised earlier to his country.
Italy had already been on the side of Germany and Austria-Hungary but were tempted to the allied side by promises of land and so the Prime minister wanted that land.
Prime Minister David Lloyd George of Britain ⇒ punishment for Germany
The British did not suffer much territorial devastation during the war but did lose a lot of men. Prime minister George therefore wanted Germany punished for this.
Prime Minister Clemenceau of France ⇒ money to rebuild his country
Prime minister Clemenceau wanted to punish Germany as well but his immediate concern was to source money to rebuild France which had been devastated the most in the war as the entirety of it in the west had been fought on French soil.
Answer:
The weaknesses of our Nation first government was that they didn't have enough power, this issue was "attempting to be resolved" by the article of Confederation, but failed
Britain put a ban on trade and money was scarce
