Sustainable development of a society means that resources are used wisely enough and will still be present for the use of the future generation. If choice A is correct, people would have the power to exploit resources as long as they have money. If choice B is correct, a country would be able to sustain itself in the expense of another country, which is morally wrong. If choice D is correct, then people in the future would only have artificial resources in their hands which would create a lot of problems in regards health, economy, etc. Therefore, all these three choices are wrong.
A society is consired sustainable if it (c) recognizes the limits of the environment and looks for alternatives to using up natural resources.
Syrita was chosen to argue with X because she was the first person he saved, as shown in option B. In this case, option B is the correct answer.
Although you haven't shown it, we can see that this question refers to the book "Superhuman" by Nicola Yoon.
When reading this book, we can see that:
- A superhero named X decides to destroy the world, as he believes that human beings are evil and that they have no salvation.
- He came to this conclusion because he was unfairly shot by cops when he was an ordinary human, as the cops shot him for being black.
- However, before wanting to destroy humanity, he saves Syrita the day she fell from a building.
For this reason, the president decides to send Syrita to talk to him, because he saved her, which shows that human beings have salvation and not all evil.
More information:
brainly.com/question/19634782
Answer:
you go out hiking. like hiking, or camping.
Explanation:
Answer:
From "On Being A Cripple" by Nancy Mairs
The claim is "I am a cripple."
Explanation:
This claim by Nancy is an assertion by her that something is. Usually, as Nancy is making the declaration, she does not provide any evidence to support her affirmation. This is because the readers of this story cannot ascertain why Nancy concludes that she is crippled. If some evidence is given, the claim remains subjective as it is the narrator's personal opinion. After all, she can still claim that she is divinely and extremely blessed in her physical condition.
Nancy Mairs (1986) wrote this short story to question the imprecise descriptions that society has been coining to label some people who are not like others in physical look, as if lessening the truth or bluntness about a person's condition could lessen the pains. For Nancy, she disagrees totally. Instead, she finds meaning and humor on being described as a cripple, the plain truth about her physical condition. She states that she is simply physically crippled. No euphemism should be intended.
Even as I am checking my write-up on this issue, it is being reported as "sensitive" instead of "vulgar." This shows that our society is relegating truth to niceties, just to pander to the sensibilities of others.
<em>A particle that has a negative charge</em>
<em></em>
<u><em>Electrons</em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<em>~Hope this answers your question!~</em>
