<span>What he taught them was to drill with muskets, march in step, switch ranks, and to fight professionally</span>
<span />
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The several ways that personal and government budgeting are similar in the following way.
Both budgets are necessary to project the series of expenses needed to make in the short, medium, and long-term. Both, the government and the personal government clearly establish how much money you have to spend when you need to spend it, the limit of money to be spent in a certain period of time, and the concept of the expenditure.
One important way they are different is the large numbers of each budget. A personal budget is about our income and how to spend it correctly so we do don create personal financial problems. On the other hand, the budget of the government is about trillions of dollars. Large sums of money have to be destined to all the important departments of the federal government, the states, and social programs.
If the federal government does not follow strict rules and parameters to respect the budget, in the end, it has to loan money which will generate more debt.
The general consensus is that the greatest obstacle to a successful invasion of D-Day was the problem posed by the English Channel.
An invasion across the English channel had only been done successfully once before in history, in 1066 when William the Conqueror led the Normans across to defeat Harold at the Battle of Hastings.
The English Channel provides a number of logistical and tactical problems in that it is difficult to cross, in some weather, but also that the opposing army is given time to prepare.
One negative about the slave trade was that it tended to increase the amount of war that occurred in West Africa. The reason for this is that European (and American) slave traders did not simply go out into the African countryside and kidnap their own slaves. Instead, they bought slaves from the coastal kingdoms. Those kingdoms generally got slaves to sell through war and through raids against inland tribes. Because the slave traders wanted more slaves, the coastal kingdoms were encouraged to wage more wars and conduct more raids against their neighbors. In addition, those kingdoms were provided with things like guns in exchange for slaves. This helped those kingdoms have a greater capacity for waging war.
This brings us to the one (short-term) benefit of the slave trade: it initially helped the coastal kingdoms. Those kingdoms became richer and more powerful because they were able to get guns, money, and other things in exchange for the slaves.
However, even these kingdoms were hurt in the long term. This is because the slave trade hurt all of West Africa. First, the slave trade took away millions of Africans (men more than women) in the prime of their lives. This badly disrupted both the cultures and the economies of the African nations. Because they were disrupted, they were less able to progress. The link below argues that the slave trade made it harder for Africa to enjoy an agrarian revolution and, in turn, an industrial revolution. This is because the men and women who could have helped make these revolutions were being taken into slavery. Because the African nations did not develop economically and because their societies were weakened, they were unable to effectively resist the Europeans when the Europeans started to colonize Africa.
Thus, we can say that Africa was badly harmed by the slave trade. The trade made war more common, harmed the economies and societies of the nations from which the slaves came, and eventually made it easier for Africa to be colonized by the Europeans.
