Answer:
They both show that Gandhi was aware of the the physical suffering going on, but wanted to go against it in boycotts and peaceful protests, no violence, yet violence was started against them. The Satyagraha shows that Gandhi was going against Britain in passive political resistance.
Answer: Great Britain and France had been fighting over wealth and land in Europe for centuries before coming to North America. It wasn't a big surprise that they disagreed over boundaries in the New World. Both countries claimed land along the Ohio River. This territory was important because of its ability to provide food to eat and furs to sell or trade. Native Americans who had lived in the river valley for generations also wanted rights to the land. When the British began to settle the eastern coast of North America, they pushed the Native Americans who had been living there to the west. However, those western lands were already home to other Native American groups and French fur trappers. Some Native American groups formed alliances with the British and French to protect themselves and their land.
Explanation:
hope i helped! can you vote for me give me a thanks and a brainliest
Answer:
In the case Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court determined that segregation was allowed as long as the facilities were "separate but equal." This was overruled with Brown v. Board of Education
With Brown, African-Americans were given civil equality but were still treated as second class citizens and were thus not socially equal. So, social equality is how people actually treat each other while political equality is how they are treated by the law.
One important advantage that primary soruces have over secondary sources is that primary sources offer a firsthand account of an event - b, which isn't the case with secondary sources. Although this leaves primary sources prone to being biased compared to secondary sources.
This is because iron is more reactive than copper in the metal reactivity series.
