Answer:
Answer for question 1: Re-enactors will never be able to completely replicate all of the situations and challenges of life in the past. Re-enactors, like historians, suffer limitations that cannot be ignored. A paucity of historical sources, for example, may mean that a recreated regiment can never be certain that its clothes are identical to those worn by troops serving in the regiment in the past. Furthermore, for the reasons of cleanliness and safety, certain characteristics cannot be replicated. Most re-enactment groups attempt to compensate for these inescapable modern effects (such as the use of modern toilets rather than digging a trench and food carried from home rather than scavenged in a nearby village) by striving for a realistic representation in every other manner.
Answer for question 2: In the absence of an audience, mainstream reenactors make an effort to appear real, yet they may fall out of character. Hidden stitches and undergarments may not be period-appropriate, but visible stitches are likely to be made in a period-correct manner. Food served in front of an audience is likely to be historically accurate, although it may not be seasonally or geographically appropriate. Modern things are occasionally utilized "after hours" or in a covert manner. The normal approach is to put on a nice show, but correctness is only required to the extent that others can see it.
Explanation:
Visitors to re-enactment activities obtain an understanding of a particular period. They gain an appreciation of how different life was in the past by simply asking questions, watching how food is prepared over a campfire, and looking at the tents that were used to sleep in. It's a true hands-on experience, since visitors are frequently allowed to sample food, touch uniforms to feel how heavy the cloth is, and learn about the steps involved in firing a musket. Through these contacts with the public, re-enactors pass on their expertise and perspective, making history very accessible. This is what distinguishes re-enactment from more traditional methods of teaching and learning history.
Answer:
Abstruse means "difficult to understand".
C. It makes the French countryside seem like a magical, unspoiled place.
The setting in paragraphs 26 and 27 helps to the development of the plot because it provides the story with an interesting twist and it arises a conflict.
The last dog is a short story by Katherine Paterson, in this story, humans live in a sealed dome and are not allowed to go outside as it is considered to be dangerous. In this context, one curious man decides to leave the dome and explore the outside world.
In paragraphs 26 and 27 of this story, the narrator describes how the main character Brocks finds some hills with trees and later a brook. This finding is extremely interesting because the character had been through trees and freshwater did not exist anymore, and therefore he is quite surprised to find these elements.
This discovery helps develop the plot of the story because it is an unexpected twist and it arises a conflict because the character starts questioning previous ideas such as:
- Considering the outside as dangerous.
- Believing life is not possible outside the dome.
Learn more about story in: brainly.com/question/7037227
Answer: answer fro number 1 is glossary fro number 2 is thesaurus fro number 3 is dictionary
Explanation:
