All categories

3 years ago

How do you see your housing needs and goals changing over time? This is an essay question.

1 answer:

4 0

They could change for many reasons some being:
1. if you're not on a lease the rent can go up at any time only
2. if you are on a lease regardless improvements to your home the landlord can raise it every year.
3. if you have a mortgage w a variable APR your mortgage/ housing needs change monthly
4. your goals would change if maybe you wanted to move closer to your job or you got a new job and you need to move closer
5. maybe if you got married or had kids your housing gold would change.
6. maybe you live in not such a nice neighborhood and you'd like to live in a neighborhood less crime your goals would change
not sure if those are the answers you're looking for but there's so many different reasons that your housing needs and goals could change

You might be interested in

What are the foundation of the case for free trade?

notka56 [123]

Answer:

the law of comparative advantage

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Coach valentine does not think that his team is playing up to its full potential. to increase the performance of the team, the c

matrenka [14]

Set specific, challenging, and reachable goals for the team. In addition, goal setting is the procedure of classifying to some degree that a team want to achieve and founding quantifiable goals and timeframes. When the team decide on a technique change to win the game in which this is an example of goal setting.

5 0

3 years ago

What is joint tenancy?

NeTakaya

Answer:

Explanation:

Joint tenancy is a lawful course of action in which at least two individuals possess a property together, each with equivalent rights and commitments. When one of the proprietors in a joint tenure dies, that proprietor's interest in the property goes to the survivors without the property experiencing the courts.

3 0

3 years ago

Garth Corporation sells a single product. If the selling price per unit and the variable expense per unit both increase by 10% a

Sonja [21]

Answer:

D) CM per unit: Increases

CM ratio: No change

BE in units: Decreases

Explanation:

Let us suppose that

In the first case

The selling price per unit is $100

And, the variable cost per unit is $50

The fixed expense is $100,000

So, the contribution margin per unit

= $100 - $50

= $50

The CM ratio is

= $50 ÷ $100

= 50%

And, the break even point in units is

= $100,000 ÷ $50

= 2,000 units

Now if the selling price per unit and the variable expense per unit both increase by 10%

So,

The selling price per unit is $100 × 1.10 = $110

And, the variable cost per unit is $50 × 1.10 = $55

The fixed expense is $100,000

So, the contribution margin per unit

= $110 - $55

= $55

The CM ratio is

= $55 ÷ $110

= 50%

And, the break even point in units is

= $100,000 ÷ $55

= 1,818 units

Hence, the last option is correct

8 0

3 years ago

In each of the following scenarios, explain and categorize the cost of inflation.a) Because inflation has risen, the J.Crew clot

Kazeer [188]

Answer:

Consider the following explanation

Explanation:

a) J. Crew is issuing its catalogs monthly in response to inflation. This will incur cost and it is known as 'Menu Cost'.

b) Grandpa has bought annuity which has promised $10,000 a year for the rest of his life. However, higher than expected inflation means grandpa has lesser purchasing power. This is loss of purchasing power and also 'redistribution cost'. In higher inflation borrower tends to get benefit. Here insurance company is at the gain.

c) Maria is witnessing loss of purchasing power because of hyper inflation. In such scenario, cost keeps rising and product's price could be higher a few hours later. This was witnessed in Germany as well as in Zimbabwe. People run to the stores as soon as they get cash or salary. It is known as 'shoe leather cost'. People make frequent trips to banks or stores but do not keep cash in fear of losing value.

d) Gita actually earned only 5% on her portfolio but as her income is in taxable bracket so she has to pay 20% tax. Her income from portfolio not even compensated inflation. This is a redistribution cost and also known as fiscal drag. More people fall into bracket because higher nominal income but real income is neglected which makes people worse off.

e) Father thinks that son is earning far more than him but inflation over the period of time erodes purchasing power and it could be possible that current income might be lower, same or higher comparing to inflation data. However, if it is lower then it is obviously loss of purchasing power.

5 0

3 years ago