The second assumption is that there is something exceptional about Africa, that while other continents and peoples have got or are getting richer, Africans, for reasons we can think but no longer speak in polite company, choose to remain in poverty. Our capacity to see Africa as divergent lets us off the hook so we don’t have to understand our own complicity in the challenges various African countries face today. It also means we rarely rage as we should against the actions of the corporations and governments that profit from instability, corruption or even inexperience (African negotiators at the climate talks have historically been disadvantaged by their lack of experience and the expectation among western negotiators that they should be grateful with whatever they get).
If there is, then, no innate propensity for corruption, violence or poverty in Africa, then the narratives that fuel the stereotypes need questioning. One possible explanation comes from the Nigerian author Chinua Achebe, who said: “The west seems to suffer deep anxieties about the precariousness of its civilisation and to have a need for constant reassurance by comparison with Africa.” Perhaps it’s not Africa that needs saving, but us.
Probably look in the middle of the cloud and then try to figure it out through the density it seems to be. lol
Answer:
C. Physical
Explanation:
The Rio Grande river is an example of a physical boundary between two countries since it is a landform. Physical boundaries are very diverse and can include oceans, seas, mountains, rivers, and lakes, just to name a few of the many landforms that can make a physical boundary.
A cultural, geometric or religious boundary could perhaps be visible with the right type of map, but a river does not tell us anything about the religious makeup of a certain area, nor does it reflect the cultural of the inhabitants.
The capital of Columbia is <span>Bogotá</span>
