Answer: All right, here goes nothing. *cracks knuckles*
To begin with, the article has a weak claim. While it does vaguely introduce their stance on the topic, it poses it as a question and not a statement. Also, this claim is written in the first person, unlike strong claims that are supposed to be written in the third person. As for the "support" section, even the very beginning strays from the original claim, instead saying why <em>they </em>should own a pet instead of why <em>everyone</em> should be allowed to own pets. For example, in the second paragraph, the author cites a story from a friend of a friend. That is not valid evidence. If it was on the news, however, and the author cited that as evidence instead, the article would be much stronger. The author also delves deeper into their own personal life instead of stating facts as they should have. The transition between paragraphs is clunky at best, with the third paragraph pretty much restating the claim instead of simply saying something like "Pets are helpful to our society." And finally, the entire purpose of that last sentence seems to be to wrap up the article in a hasty fashion, without any attention to restating the claim or the facts presented.
Hope this meets the criteria! Good luck!!
What are the sentences ????????
Answer:
Tom has more money than the other Puritans, and he certainly makes the people in the church aware of his presence. He's well liked and respected.... but his journey into the afterlife doesn't work out to well for him..... Thus, the other prominent citizens are better off.
Explanation:
Answer:
1 is verb
2 is author
3 is published
4 is informed
Explanation:
Verbs are words used to describe an occurence, action, or state. So that is the correct answer hope helps :D
