You need to read the story and mark the gramatical mistakes in it. Some are mispelled words, words that need to be captialized, and sometimes a spot in the sentence that needs a comma but one isnt there, or there is a comma where its not supposed to be.
For example: "So" I said, "when does te enchantment start"
You need to add a comma after 'so' and a question mark after 'start'.
It should look like this: "So<em><u>,</u></em>" I said, "when does the enchantment start<u>?</u>"
D = { ..., - 3, - 2 , - 1 , 0, 1 , 2 , 3 , ...}
E = { 1, 4, 9, 16, 25 }
F = { 21, 23, 25, 27, 29 }
D ∩ E = { 1, 4, 9 , 16, 25 } - False ( A )
D ∩ F = {21, 23, 25 , 27, 29 } - False ( B )
E ∩ F = { 25 } - False ( D )
D ∩ ( E ∪ F ) = { 1, 4, 9 , 16, 21, 23, 25, 27, 29 } - False ( E )
Answer:
Correct statement is:
C ) D ∪ ( E ∩ F ) = { all whole numbers }
Answer: Food can bring happiness
Explanation:
It just does
Your answer is C: Carmen is a volunteer at the local hospital. a predicate nominative is the word in a nominative case that completes a copulative verb. for example: the word "son" in "charlie is my son"
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Remark
What huck sees and how he interprets it is what this short comment is about. I would pick
<em>Despite his lack of formal upbringing, Huck has good intuition when it comes to reading situations.</em>
<em />
Yes, he exaggerates some, but the exaggeration does nothing to distort what he's looking at.
He doesn't always look for humor and sometimes he just plain wrong. I think it's Chapter 16 where Jim talks about the value of children and concludes that Solomon was not as wise as he was made out to be. Jim's insightful analysis is way above Huck's head and the passage is neither funny nor Jim's analysis exaggerated.
