Laura's interactions with her husband reveal the conflicts experienced by her, as instead of openly disagreeing with her husband’s desire to return to the Dominican Republic, she criticizes the foreign papers he reads.
<h3>What is a conflict?</h3>
A desire, the nature of which is opposite and endangered to that of the desire of the other person, is known as a conflict. In literature, a conflict can also be called as problems faced by a character in the composition.
In the example given above, Laura is seen interacting with her husband, and criticizes him indirectly by pointing at the foreign paper which he reads. This is an expression of conflict in the statement.
Hence, option D holds true regarding the conflict experienced by Laura.
Learn more about conflict here:
brainly.com/question/17085630
#SPJ1
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The narrator talks about how the fire wasting a man that was tied to a stake. Assuming that the fire is symbolic for fate, it makes sense for this passage to describe parraylissis. Especially when looking in the context of the last sentence, describing the man as a "unalterable mold" "made of solid bronze" someone who is unaltered is unable to move, and solid bronze is unmovable by human hands after a certain amount is gathered. I was debating between A and D though, so I'll tell you why I didn't pick D. d refers to nature and mans lack of ability to change it, however where nature is involved in the passage (fire) the man doesn't try to shape or change it, it changes the man.
A statement proving another wrong
Honestly..... You didn't do anything wrong because it is a communication barrier. And you both didn't understand each other. Hope this helps you out. Good luck!