<h2>
Answer: $78,00</h2>
Accounts receivable from sales transactions were $51,000 at the beginning of the year and $64,000 at the end of the year. Net income reported on the income statement for the year was $105,000. Exclusive of the effect of other adjustments, the cash flows from operating activities to be reported on the statement of cash flows prepared by the indirect method is?
Accounts receivable from sales transactions were $51,000 at the beginning of the year and $64,000 at the end of the year. Net income reported on the income statement for the year was $105,000. Exclusive of the effect of other adjustments, the cash flows from operating activities to be reported on the statement of cash flows prepared by the indirect method is?
Accounts receivable from sales transactions were $51,000 at the beginning of the year and $64,000 at the end of the year. Net income reported on the income statement for the year was $105,000. Exclusive of the effect of other adjustments, the cash flows from operating activities to be reported on the statement of cash flows prepared by the indirect method is?
Explanation:
Answer:
B. $9,957.
Explanation:
The computation is adjusted amount for Uncollectible account expense is shown below:
= The estimated total uncollectible accounts + debit balance of Allowance for uncollectible accounts
= $7,322 + $2,635
= $9,957
For computing the adjusted amount we added the estimated total uncollectible accounts and the debit balance of Allowance for uncollectible accounts
Answer
The demand for land will increase. and the price of land will increase.
Answer:
the three of them could be held personally liable:
- I. John
- II. John's manager
- III. The CEO, who in this specific case we assume could have prevented the crime.
Explanation:
John committed forgery and possibly fraud by forging clients' signatures on documents held by the company. His boss ordered him to do so, so he is also responsible for John's actions. John can even try to put all the blame on his boss alleging that he was forced to forge the signatures. The CEO of the firm is also responsible because the forged documents had to serve someone's illegal purposes, and the CEO probably was the one that needed them or knew about what was going on and didn't do anything to stop it.
Answer:
the correct answer is
D. Organizational impact analysis
good luck