1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
uysha [10]
3 years ago
11

2 Points

English
2 answers:
joja [24]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: D. Jackson relies on long, flowing sentences, whereas Rutledge relies on short, direct sentences.

Explanation:

Andrew Jackson’s address to the Congress and Michael Rutledge’s “Samuel’s Memory” certainly differ in writing techniques and language use. In Jackson's speech, there are long sentences, which makes the speech convincing and helps him demonstrate his intelligence. However, Rutledge's sentences are often short, quite simple and straightforward.

zaharov [31]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: jackson relies on a sophisticated vocabulary, whereas rutledge relies on a simple vocabulary

Explanation: i just did it on apex

You might be interested in
How old is Lisa and why does she want to look more sophisticated?
Elis [28]
Because girls get crushes on cute teacher
5 0
3 years ago
They are basically very timid animals and 5 exscape from their enemies by jumping away on their strong and powerful hind legs. L
tatiyna

B is correct

They are basically very timid animals and 5 exscape from their enemies by jumping away on their strong and powerful hind legs.

Look at the underlined section labelled 5. There may be a mistake in punctuation, capitalization, or spelling.

If you find a mistake choose the answer that corrects the mistake. If there is no mistake,

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is Obama's refutation in his speech?
fomenos

Answer:

Twelve years ago, Barack Obama introduced himself to the American public by way of a speech given at the Democratic National Convention, in Boston, in which he declared, “There is not a black America and a white America and Latino America, an Asian America; there’s the United States of America.” Few of us believed this to be true, but most, if not all of us, longed for it to be. We vested this brash optimist with our hope, a resource that was in scarce supply three years after the September 11th terrorist attacks in a country mired in disastrous military conflicts in two nations. The vision he offered—of national reconciliation beyond partisan bounds, of government rooted in respect for the governed and the Constitution itself, of idealism that could actually be realized—became the basis for his Presidential campaign. Twice the United States elected to the Presidency a biracial black man whose ancestry and upbringing stretched to three continents.

At various points that idealism has been severely tested. During his Presidency, we witnessed a partisan divide widen into an impassable trench, and gun violence go unchecked while special interests blocked any regulation. The President was forced to show his birth certificate, which we recognized as the racial profiling of the most powerful man in the world. Obama did not, at least publicly, waver in his contention that Americans were bound together by something greater than what divided them. In July, when he spoke in Dallas after a gunman murdered five police officers, he seemed pained by the weight of this faith, as if stress fractures had appeared in a load-bearing wall.

It is difficult not to see the result of this year’s Presidential election as a refutation of Obama’s creed of common Americanism. And on Wednesday, for the first time in the twelve years that we’ve been watching him, Obama did not seem to believe the words he was speaking to the American public. In the White House Rose Garden, Obama offered his version of a concession speech—an acknowledgement of Donald Trump’s victory. The President attempted gamely to cast Trump’s victory as part of the normal ebb and flow of political fortunes, and as an example of the great American tradition of the peaceful transfer of power. (This was not, it should be recalled, the peaceful transfer of power that most observers were worried about.) He intended, he said, to offer the same courtesy toward Trump that President George W. Bush had offered him, in 2008. Yet that reference only served to highlight the paradox of Obama's Presidency: he now exists in history bracketed by the overmatched forty-third President and the misogynistic racial demagogue who will succeed him as the forty-fifth. During his 2008 campaign, Obama frequently found himself—and without much objection on his part—compared to Abraham Lincoln. He may now share an ambivalent common bond with Lincoln, whose Presidency was bookended by James Buchanan and Andrew Johnson, two lesser lights of American history.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following items are true of early nuclear science?
dedylja [7]
B and d I know for a fact
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which would be an example of something transitional?
andrew11 [14]

Answer:

D. A bird flying from its nest.

Explanation:

This is a transition from not flying, to flying which I would consider is transitional.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which historical reality lead to the development of modern poetry
    6·2 answers
  • What does Gladwell share about Mozart’s development
    5·1 answer
  • Which resource requires you to check its work to be sure all words are spelles and use correctly
    8·1 answer
  • Which character is described in these lines?
    10·2 answers
  • Which interpretation focuses on critical them of the poem? A. This poem focuses on the beauty of nature and its harmony with hum
    10·1 answer
  • 1. What are 2-3 concepts from this unit and what did you learn about them? You must use your own definitions.
    15·1 answer
  • Can you correct the sentences? Please and thank you!!
    7·2 answers
  • CAN ANYONE DO AN SHORT CHRISTMAS CAROL ESSAY FOR ME??​
    5·2 answers
  • The first three articles of the U.S. Constitution explain _____.
    10·1 answer
  • What is the authors’ claim in this passage?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!