Answer:
No, The women were not justified in hiding the evidence.
Explanation:
In the book, "Trifles", by Susan Glaspell, she narrates a murder incident involving a couple. The couple were Mr. and Mrs. John Wright. John Wright was described as a temperamental man who subdued his wife. Mrs. Wright had just been arrested by the police for the suspicious murder of her husband. Two police officers, accompanied by their wives, Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters came to the house to investigate the scene and collect evidence. The women came to the house with the intention of bringing a change of clothes for Mrs. Wright who was now in custody. There, they found evidence that Mrs. Wright likely killed her husband.
One of the pieces of evidence was the wrung neck of Mrs. Wrights canary which they believed was killed by Mr. Wright. They were thus convinced that Mrs Wright was being ill treated by Mr. Wright prompting her to kill her husband. They then conceal the evidence from their husbands.
Though this act was out of compassion for the woman, it was wrong for the following reasons;
- The law is supposed to take its course.
- Mrs Wright was supposed to seek help or annul the marriage when it was being detrimental to her rather than resort to murder which is an offence to the law.
- A lawyer would have also helped Mrs. Wright even if the evidence was submitted.
- Not submitting the evidence also makes it seem like the women supported the crime.
B or C but I’m not sure cause I’ve never read the passage
Answer:
Protest Literature is a text that protests society. But, when you think about it, is literature divided into protest type literature OR is it is a way that someone artistically expressed themselves? People put their emotion, values, and things that they are concerned about into literature every day that they want you to read. Is it protest to portray your point of view on a given subject? You desire change. Society needs to change. Why not write what you believe and encourage others to see what your point of view is?
Spiegelman had a nervous breakdown. He decided to unload on the world with his comic about his parent's Holocaust experience. His father was a survivor of Auschwitz. He wanted to change the comic book world. He was a graphic novelist!
Urrea's book was non fiction too. He wrote about the deaths of 14 Mexicans attempting to cross into the US.
I think that if you have the opportunity to compare and contrast, I would focus on the fact that these people who suffered were all immigrants. Both stories are about hope and death. Both stories show that there is a need for change. Write about Bias against these people and discuss how the bodies of each of the groups of people discussed in each story were horrendous and awful for a human to experience.
Hope this helps.
Explanation:
When I read about the Holocaust, I do not do it for pleasure. When I read about illegal immigrants and children being stuck in pens, I do not read it for pleasure. I read it to learn how I can be a game changer in our world. How can I change the way the things were done this and how can we finally have peace?