Answer:
The loss of the financial institution is $413,000
Explanation:
Let's say that after 3 years the financial institution will receive:
0.5 * 10% of $10million
= 0.5 * 0.1 * 10000000
= $500,000
Then, they will pay 0.5 * 9% of $10M
= 0.5 * 0.09 * 10000000
= $450,000
Therefore, their immediate loss would be $500000 - $450000
= $50000.
Let's assume that forward rates are realized to value the rest of the swap.
The forward rates = 8% per annum.
Therefore, the remaining cash flows are assumed that floating payment is
0.5*0.08*10000000 =
$400,000
Received net payment would be:
500,000-400,000= $100,000. The total cost of default is therefore the cost of foregoing the following cash flows:
Year 3=$50,000
Year 3.5=$100,000
Year 4 = $100,000
Year 4.5= $100,000
Year 5 = $100,000
Discounting these cash flows to year 3 at 4% per six months, the cost of default would be $413,000
Answer:
as taxes increase, there is a decrease in supply
Explanation:
Answer:B. Opponents of active stabilization policy believe that significant time lag in both fiscal and monetary policy often excercebate economic fluctuations.
C. Advocate of active stabilization policy believe that the government can adjust monetary and fiscal policy to counter waves of excessive optimism and pessimism among consumers and business.
Examples of automatic stabilizer
A. Corporate income taxes
B. Personal income taxes
Explanation:
Stabilization policy helps to stabilize the economy during expansionary or deficit period however a lag in the implementation will surely affect getting the right outputs from the implementation.
The economy has inbuilt stabilizer s that tend to correct excessiveness in economy such as the personal and corporate tax . The federal fund rate will be adjusted as the need be to stabilizer the economy even though it can be used as a stabilizer but it's not an automatic stabilizer.
Hello!
Often people put up signs that, that person likes and is interested in. People also can bargain with a person. So if they are leaving because they think the product is to high of a price for them, then you can tell them you can lower the price.
( word of advice, this is a last resort option)
I hope it helps!
Answer: sunk costs don't increase as driving increases.
Explanation: sunk costs are irrelevant costs because they have already occured in the past and cannot be avoided. Sunk costs thus do not differ between alternatives, and are unavoidable. The calculation for insurance and other sunk costs are likely not based on the amount of rides the Uber picks up, but rather calculated at a constant rate. So regardless of whether or not the rider pays more or less than the $.50 on the insurance, this will not have any effect on the insurance that is constant and has likely already been paid out.
