1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
liq [111]
3 years ago
7

3. "a varies directly with b". If a = 4 when b = 21, find a when b-7.

Mathematics
2 answers:
Irina-Kira [14]3 years ago
8 0

Step-by-step explanation:

A(promotional sign)b

A=kb

4=21k

K=0. 1904

A=0. 2b

A=0. 2×7

A=1. 4

goldfiish [28.3K]3 years ago
7 0

:

Step-by-step explanation:

a varies directly with b

a ∞ b

a = Kb

K is the constant of proportionality

If a = 4 when b = 21

4 = 21×k

4 = 21k

k = 4/21

: - a = 4b/21

find a when b= 7.

a = 4(7)/21

a = 4/3

a = 1 1/3

You might be interested in
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
3 years ago
Can someone please<br> Help me?
Mila [183]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  see below

Step-by-step explanation:

It is easiest to compare the equations when they are written in the same form.

The first set can be written in slope-intercept form.

  y = 2x +7

  y = 2x +7 . . . . add 2x

These equations are <em>identical</em>, so have infinitely many solutions.

__

The second set can be written in standard form.

  y +4x = -5

  y +4x = -10

These equations <em>differ only in their constant</em>, so have no solutions.

__

The third set is already written in slope-intercept form. The equations have <em>different slopes</em>, so have exactly one solution.

5 0
3 years ago
the ratio of red marbles to blue marbles in a bag is 2 to 3 .which of the following could be the number of red and blue marbles
Andreas93 [3]

Answer:

1/2

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The answer is C, but I don't understand why- can anyone tell me?
finlep [7]

Answer:

It's C because we are adding a number on the x but here we skip 5 so it's 6, and on y we add 4 up but since we skipped 5 we add 8 and we get 24. 6, 24. You may say "but SpiritBear, 17 plus eight is 25" and that is true, but if you notice the lowest dot actually starts on 5, not 4 making C right.

Hope this helped and wasn't too confusing

7 0
2 years ago
Which statements about the local maximums and minimums for the given function are true? Choose three options.
Nostrana [21]

Answer:

Over the interval [2, 4], the local minimum is –8.

Over the interval [3, 5], the local minimum is –8.

Over the interval [1, 4], the local maximum is 0.

Step-by-step explanation:

The true statements are:

Over the interval [2, 4], the local minimum is –8.

Over the interval [3, 5], the local minimum is –8.

Over the interval [1, 4], the local maximum is 0.  

Lets discuss each option one by one:

Over the interval [1, 3], the local minimum is 0

This is a false statement. Look at the graph. The minimum point given is (3.4,-8). Therefore the local minimum is -8 not 0

Over the interval [2, 4], the local minimum is –8.

This statement is true because the given minimum point is(3.4, -8). Thus the  local minimum is -8 which is true

Over the interval [3, 5], the local minimum is –8.

According to the given minimum point, the local minimum  is -8 which is true

Over the interval [1, 4], the local maximum is 0.

Look at the graph. The maximum point given is (2,0). Thus this statement is true because local maximum is 0.

Over the interval [3, 5], the local maximum is 0.

This is a false statement because there is no maximum point

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Is 5/10 and 8/18 proportional
    5·2 answers
  • What is the constant of variation,k, of the direct variation,y=kx,through (5,8)
    11·2 answers
  • 25/22 in decimal form.rounded to the nearest hundredth
    11·1 answer
  • Snslsndodndidndkdndkdndldkdkdmdldmdd pls hell
    6·1 answer
  • What is the length of the hypotenuse of the triangle?
    9·2 answers
  • HELP PLEASE!! WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!!!
    9·1 answer
  • M14 + 4 = 8 solve for m with steps
    7·1 answer
  • The ratio of boys to girls in a class is 3:1. There are 36 students in the class. How many students are girls?
    10·2 answers
  • A train travels 540 miles in 12 hours.
    5·2 answers
  • For her phone service, Lucy pays a monthly fee of $25, and she pays an additional $0.06 per minute of use. The least she has bee
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!