When would a bill go to a conference committee in Congress?

2 answers:

4 0

Going to conference. Conference committees operate after the House and the Senate have passed different versions of a bill.Conference committees exist to draft a compromise bill that both houses can accept. Both houses of Congress must eventually pass identical legislation for the bill to be presented to the President

Lorico [155]3 years ago

3 0

After the house and senate have accepted different versions of the bill. A conference committee is to draft a compromised bill that both the house and senate can accept.

You might be interested in

If a sound increases 5 dB, the sound becomes _______ times louder

MrMuchimi

25 times louder than it was before

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A graph titled Percent of Population 25 Years and Over with a High School Diploma or More by Race shows percent labeled on the x

Ostrovityanka [42]

Answer:-few African-American receive high school diplomas than whites

Explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

Which action occurs in a presidential government but not in parliamentary <br> government

MakcuM [25]

Both presidentialism and parliamentarism are unequivocally democratic, but each of these regimes leads to different political consequences.

The great difference is that in parliamentarism the executive branch is composed of a president or a monarch, head of state, with limited powers, and a government appointed by Parliament, which at any time can censor. In presidentialism, however, the head of state and government coincide in the same person, are not subject to parliamentary censure and the Legislative Branch is limited to the area of law making.

Therefore, in presidentialism, voters elect the head of government (who in turn is head of state); instead, in parliamentarism, the head of government is appointed by the head of state, who is voted by the people.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Does it matter how we remember events and places?

White raven [17]

Answer:

i don't think so as long as you remember it.

Explanation:

8 0

1 year ago

Explain the principle of checks and balances as it relates to the power of the president. Provide one example to support your ex

Scrat [10]

Checks and Balances was designed to keep each branch from assuming too much power. Presidential power is checked and balanced in many ways. While he can veto various bills and keep them from becoming laws, he can be overridden by a 2/3 vote in both houses. SO if the Congress feels like the President is over stepping his bounds then they can in turn overrule him. The Supreme Court is also in the mix in that if they deem a law to be unconstitutional then they can rule it so and the law is no more. Presidents can influence Supreme Courts by whom they nominate for open positions (or in the case of one President, attempt to add more judges to the Court). However, after the nomination is made and the Senate approves and confirms them then they are free. The only way a Judge can be removed is they are found to be doing something illegal, deemed incompetent and unable to continue doing their job, resign, or die. This allows judges to "operate outside the realm of politics." The idea is that they can focus and not worry about politics and we can assume that decisions will be made free from political influences and bribery.

6 0

3 years ago