1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vsevolod [243]
3 years ago
6

Why it is important to recognize that President Abraham Lincoln was not always the “Great Emancipator?” Does this make him less

admirable?
History
1 answer:
kirill115 [55]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:Abraham Lincoln was the 16th president of the United States of America, who successfully prosecuted the Civil War to preserve the nation. He played in key role in passage of the Thirteenth Amendment, which officially ended slavery in America.

For some Americans, Abraham Lincoln remains the Great Emancipator, the man who freed the African-American slaves. ... A fair answer requires that we evaluate Lincoln in the context of his times and of his role in public life. “I have always hated slavery as much as any abolitionist,” Lincoln said in 1858. so the answer is no nothing can make him less admirable.

You might be interested in
I NEED HELP ASP PLEASE 3. Why does Wilson believe that there will be large numbers
seraphim [82]

Answer:

(4) Wilson might fear that if the US picks one side, they might have new enemies and lose.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Why did Japan leave the League of Nations?
Vera_Pavlovna [14]
C, I believe.

Hope this helps!
7 0
3 years ago
I need help on this it is algebra 1 it
olga nikolaevna [1]
I did three of the problems

8 0
3 years ago
What happened to Latin after the fall of Rome
Hitman42 [59]

Well all the books and literature were in latin so it was kept mostly by the monks. They still speak latin to this day. But as years went on cultural mixing happened and latin became Italian, Spanish, Romanian, French and Portuguese.

7 0
4 years ago
How did the united states acquire the Louisiana purchase?
Rufina [12.5K]

Louisiana Purchase (French: Vente de la Louisiane 'Sale of Louisiana') was the acquisition of the Louisiana territory of New France (828,000 sq mi (2,140,000 km2; 530,000,000 acres)) by the United States from France in 1803. The U.S. paid fifty million francs ($11,250,000) and a cancellation of debts worth eighteen million francs ($3,750,000) for a total of sixty-eight million francs ($15 million, equivalent to about $600 billion given the GDP of 2017[1]). The Louisiana territory included land from fifteen present U.S. states and two Canadian provinces. The territory contained land that forms Arkansas, Missouri, Iowa, Oklahoma, Kansas, and Nebraska; the portion of Minnesota west of the Mississippi River; a large portion of North Dakota; a large portion of South Dakota; the northeastern section of New Mexico; the northern portion of Texas; the area of Montana, Wyoming, and Colorado east of the Continental Divide; Louisiana west of the Mississippi River (plus New Orleans); and small portions of land within the present Canadian provinces of Alberta and Saskatchewan. Its non-native population was around 60,000 inhabitants, of whom half were African slaves.[2]

The Kingdom of France controlled the Louisiana territory from 1699 until it was ceded to Spain in 1762. In 1800, Napoleon, then the First Consul of the French Republic, hoping to re-establish an empire in North America, regained ownership of Louisiana. However, France's failure to put down the revolt in Saint-Domingue, coupled with the prospect of renewed warfare with the United Kingdom, prompted Napoleon to sell Louisiana to the United States to fund his military. The Americans originally sought to purchase only the port city of New Orleans and its adjacent coastal lands, but quickly accepted the bargain. The Louisiana Purchase occurred during the term of the third President of the United States, Thomas Jefferson. Before the purchase was finalized, the decision faced Federalist Party opposition; they argued that it was unconstitutional to acquire any territory. Jefferson agreed that the U.S. Constitution did not contain explicit provisions for acquiring territory, but he asserted that his constitutional power to negotiate treaties was sufficient.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the environment of Arabia serve as a form of protection during much of the region's history?
    11·1 answer
  • Powerful military lawyers who headed small territories
    13·2 answers
  • Jason lives in a country in which political power derives solely from the people, where he and fellow citizens elect representat
    9·2 answers
  • 1 more to go and i'll be done
    5·1 answer
  • Which affect do some believe third-party candidate Ross Perot had on the 1992 election? -For Brainliest!-
    14·1 answer
  • The idea government should not interfere with or regulate industries and businesses , what is this ?
    8·1 answer
  • summer school is over, and I'm feeling self-destructive. Take all of my points and have a good night. 2/3
    11·2 answers
  • Describe the Site and strategy for the British-French campaign against Turkey? (Site 2)
    9·1 answer
  • Ayeeee brain thingy help
    12·1 answer
  • The development of atomic energy was based on the theories of:
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!