1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Harman [31]
3 years ago
6

The Boxers were anti-Christian. True False

History
1 answer:
valkas [14]3 years ago
4 0

I'm pretty sure that's true.



You might be interested in
What ultimately happened to the rosenbergs?
amm1812
Sentenced to death in 30 years in prison
8 0
3 years ago
How would you describe the life in the court of suleiman the magnificent court
DochEvi [55]
The Europeans called him "The Magnificent," but the Ottomans called him Kanuni, or "The Lawgiver." The Suleymanie Mosque, built for Suleyman, describes Suleyman in its inscription as Nashiru kawanin al-Sultaniyye , or "Propagator of the Sultanic Laws." The primacy of Suleyman as a law-giver is at the foundation of his place in Islamic history and world view. It is perhaps important to step back a moment and closely examine this title to fully understand Suleyman's place in history.

The word used for law here, kanun, has a very specific reference. In Islamic tradition, the Shari'ah, or laws originally derived from the Qur'an , are meant to be universally applied across all Islamic states. No Islamic ruler has the power to overturn or replace these laws. So what laws was Suleyman "giving" to the Islamic world? What precisely does kanun refer to since it doesn't refer to the main body of Islamic law, the Shari'ah ?

The kanun refer to situational decisions that are not covered by the Shari'ah . Even though the Shari'ah provides all necessary laws, it's recognized that some situations fall outside their parameters. In Islamic tradition, if a case fell outside the parameters of the Shari'ah , then a judgement or rule in the case could be arrived at through analogy with rules or cases that are covered by the Shari'ah . This method of juridical thinking was only accepted by the most liberal school of Shari'ah , Hanifism, so it is no surprise that Hanifism dominated Ottoman law.

The Ottomans, however, elevated kanun into an entire code of laws independent of the Shari'ah. The first two centuries of Ottoman rule, from 1350 to 1550, saw an explosion of kanun rulings and laws, so that by the beginning of the sixteenth century, the kanun were a complete and independent set of laws that by and large were more important than the Shari'ah . This unique situation was brought about in part because of the unique heritage of the Ottomans. In both Turkish and Mongol traditions, the imperial law, or law pronounced by the monarch, was considered sacred. They even had a special word for it: the Turks called it Türe and the Mongols called it Yasa . In the system of Türe and Yasa , imperial law was regarded as the essential and sacred foundation of the empire. When this tradition collided with the Islamic Shari'ah tradition, a compromised system combining both was formed.

The Sultanic laws were first collected together by Mehmed the Conqueror. Mehmed divided the kanun into two separate sets or laws. The first set dealt with the organization of government and the military, and the second set dealt with the taxation and treatment of the peasantry. The latter group was added to after the death of Mehmed and the Ottoman kanun pretty much crystallized into its final form in 1501. Suleyman, for his part, revised the law code, but on the whole the Suleyman code of laws is pretty identical to the 1501 system of laws. However, it was under Suleyman that the laws took their final form; no more revisions were made after his reign. From this point onwards, this code of laws was called, kanun-i 'Osmani , or the "Ottoman laws."

Hope this helps
4 0
3 years ago
Which war between the settlers and American Indians caused several Indian tribes to move to the west and south? 
Pie
A. Iroquois War
Hope this helps
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The man who saved Jamestown from failure was
tekilochka [14]
Captain John Smith was the man to save jamestown.
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
***HELP ASAP***
olasank [31]
Napoleon Bonaparte, sorry don't know the other answer.<span />
3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Adams didn’t want any criticism of the country or the president so he had congress pass what?
    10·1 answer
  • What part did the Directory play in Napoleon’s rise to power?
    14·1 answer
  • One of the major obstacles of Kennedy's campaign for the presidency was his ___________.
    13·1 answer
  • Describe the succession of the crown of the Holy Roman Emperor in the 1550's.​
    11·1 answer
  • How did the cotton Gin impact?
    5·2 answers
  • Which describes Justinian's Code?
    8·2 answers
  • Wat is the answer pl
    9·2 answers
  • What was the author purpose for writing this article
    10·2 answers
  • Do you think it is worth giving up some of the kinds of freedoms included in the Bill of
    14·1 answer
  • When Andrew Carnegie stated, "The man who
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!