1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
GarryVolchara [31]
3 years ago
14

the labor force statics and your knowledge of industrial growth and progressive reform what conclusion can you reach about wages

during this period?
History
2 answers:
sattari [20]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

    The Industrial Revolution caused profound changes in the world, and one of these changes occurred in the productive process and in the workers' lifestyle. In order for us to understand how the worker's life has changed, we need to visualize, beforehand, the changes in the goods production process using the context of textile production.

    Before the Industrial Revolution, the production process was manufacturing, that is, production took place in a manufacture, in which production was manual and the worker performed his work through his artisanal ability. With the development of the machines, production became part of the machinery, that is, the machine was largely responsible for production.

   Thus, if, before the machine, production needed the craftsman's skill, now it was no longer necessary because any worker could handle the machine and carry out the entire process alone. In practice, this means that a worker with manual skills was no longer needed, and the result was that their wages decreased.

Simora [160]3 years ago
4 0
That the pay is low
You might be interested in
Identify the policies of the Monroe Doctrine. True or false
Sidana [21]
The Monroe Doctrine is the best known U.S. policy toward the Western Hemisphere. Buried in a routine annual message delivered to Congress by President James Monroe in December 1823, the doctrine warns European nations that the United States would not tolerate further colonization or puppet monarchs.
8 0
2 years ago
In 1883, the Supreme Court ruled that there was a difference between
irina [24]

Answer:

1st Option: Discrimination committed by governments and discrimination committed by individuals.

Explanation:

In 1883, The United States Supreme Court ruled that the Civil Rights act of 1875, forbidding discrimination in hotels, trains, and other public spaces, was unconstitutional and not authorized by the 13th or 14th Amendments of the Constitution.

7 0
3 years ago
Please help me with this I would appreciate it so much
zhannawk [14.2K]

Answer: 13,14,15,16,18,19, and 20 are opinion and the rest are claim.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
How did julius caesar come to complete power and declare himself dictator for life? heused his wealth to gain favor with the mas
Darya [45]
Caesar had fought in many battles or wars and became a part of Roman politics and that is how he became dictator of Roman Empire and he ruled just for one year because he was assassinated by political rivals" Gaius Cassius Longinus and Marcus Junius Brutus" at a military camp on a modern day Iraq. But Cesar was a nobleman who helped peoples of Roman.
6 0
3 years ago
Write an essay which answers the following question.
Nastasia [14]

"See you in court!"

"You can't do that. I know my rights!"

"I'm going to take this all the way to the Supreme Court!"

These cliche words illustrate a fundamental American belief: residents of the United States have the right to seek redress through the legal system.

But how do courts safeguard citizens' rights?

How does a matter come to the Supreme Court in the first place? How are fundamental rights safeguarded? Where do folks turn when their liberties, rights, or equality are threatened? Is justice served?

Throughout history, the American people have sought justice through the courts. As a result, the judicial system is a pillar of democracy in the United States.

The president and the executive branch make recommendations and create policy, while Congress enact legislation. Judges, according to American values, make fair and smart choices that elected officials find difficult to make.

Members of Congress, state governors, and the president must be concerned about elections and popular sentiment at all times. As a result, they may lose sight of the importance of preserving American principles, and they may enact hasty or unfair measures.

The courts act as watchdogs for the other arms of government, guided by constitutional principles. Democracy might easily deviate from its intended path if the judicial system is not in place.

But, in practice, does the American legal system follow these ideals? There are several examples of innocent individuals being imprisoned and even convicts being executed for crimes they did not commit. There are many judicial critics. Some claim that the rich or well-connected are given preferential treatment in the courts.

Other judicial opponents point to statistics they say show racial and socioeconomic prejudice. A disproportionate amount of convicts, for example, are young, African American, and male.

Poor people's legal defense attorneys are frequently chastised for being inept or uncaring. Cases in both federal and state courts are sometimes held up for years, creating a farce of the "right to a prompt public trial" provided by Amendment VI Bill of right of the United States Constitution.

When it comes to appointing federal judges, Congress and the president frequently clash. Because Republicans oppose a Democratic president's selections (and vice versa), vacancies in the judiciary can last for months, if not years.

Despite these concerns, courts continue to be strong guardians of liberties.

Freedom of expression has been safeguarded, whether the speaker was a critic of unfair government policy or a flag burning.

Segregation of public facilities came to an end in part because courageous people brought their cases to court. Interpretations of religious freedom have prohibited involuntary school prayer, preserving the separation of church and state but raising concerns that the Judeo-Christian tradition on which the nation was built is gradually eroding.

Despite the fact that the wheels of justice typically turn slowly, judges' rulings are usually the ultimate word when it comes to interpreting core constitutional concepts. The American court system has played a significant role in defining and sustaining freedom, equality, and justice almost from its inception.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The person most known for contributing to the final form of the Constitution was A) James Madison. B) George Washington. C) Benj
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following aspects of Mayan culture was not shared by the ancient Mesopotamians? used astronomical calendars invente
    7·2 answers
  • What are Siena, Florence, Lucca, Venice, and Genoa? Please answer asap!
    13·1 answer
  • Who was removed as general of the Union army for ordering his men to charge across an open field while being attacked by Confede
    11·1 answer
  • Which actions did Spain take leading up to and during the Revolutionary War? check all that apply​
    6·1 answer
  • What would you expect the thirteen English colonies to have in common?
    13·1 answer
  • Founders who supported natural rights also supported adding the Bill of Rights to the Constitution because
    11·2 answers
  • Congress decides to pass a law that increases minimum wage, this is an example of using a(n) __________ power.
    8·2 answers
  • Describing Humidity
    13·2 answers
  • 13. Which of the following is TRUE of Africa after the Berlin Conference?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!