Answer: The correct answer is : Because modern technology allows them to analyze, evaluate and make their own decisions about the candidates.
Explanation: Party identifications are very important for many voters because they give a regular perspective through which voters can see the political landscape. The initiative petition enables voters to put proposed legislation on the ballot.
There are several synonyms of the word howl, among others: squeak, scream, bellow, roar, yelp, growl, bellow, shriek, scream, lament, loud voice, clamor, complaint, baladro, snort, mooing. The howling is a prolonged and sharp moan that some animals emit.
The difference between Mesopotamian and Egyptian societies is based on the religions, cultures, political scenarios, technology, and writings.
<h3>Who were the
Mesopotamians? </h3>
Mesopotamians were the people living in the region of Western Asia during the era of the ancient period.
Mesopotamian and Egyptian societies are contrasted as follows:
- Religion: In Mesopotamian society, the kings were treated as the gods and in the Egyptian societies, the pharaohs were the religious gods.
- Cultures: Mesopotamian people were engaged in agriculture around the Tigris river whereas the Egyptian people did the same around the Nile river.
- Political scenario: Egyptian societies had a central government whereas the Mesopotamian societies had a government in each province.
- Technology: Egyptians were more inclined toward scientific technology and innovations whereas the initiation of cuneiform writings was the invention by Mesopotamian societies.
- Writings: Mesopotamians used cuneiform letters for their writings whereas Egyptians used hieroglyphics in their writings.
Therefore, both societies were distinguished on the basis of some defined points.
Learn more about the Mesopotamians in the related link:
brainly.com/question/26116131
#SPJ1
During the renaissance ,churches that grew out of protest against the power abuses of the roman catholic church was called ?
ANSWER: protestant
This seems to be an opinion based question, I will provide you with both a yes and no response with arguments to support it and you can choose which one best suites your beliefs:
Yes, the benefits of raising the minimum wage outweigh the drawbacks. By raising the minimum wage you increase the quality of life for workers. Many full time workers are unable to afford housing or groceries in this economy on the minimum wage. At $7.25/hour and 40hrs/week is $290 before taxes. This is not enough income to cover the basic costs of living in most places. If people earned more money they would have more money to spend and corporations would profit from an increase in sales. Also, workers wouldn't have to depend so much on government services such as food stamps and section 8 housing assistance because they would be able to support their families with their own income. This would free up funds for government to provide more for the school systems, better healthcare and/or infrastructure.
No, the benefits of an increased minimum wage would not outweigh the drawbacks. The drawbacks of a higher minimum wage are significant because they most directly effect small business owners. The "mom and pop shop" owners depend on paying low salaries in order to keep their doors open. If they were forced to increase their pay rates, by what many minimum wage supporters suggest: more than double, they would not be able to afford employees to keep their doors open. Also, government agencies would be forced to pay their low-level workers as much as $15/hr which could become a tax burden on the citizens who pay for the salaries of all government employees. Raising the minimum wage would be detrimental to the economy because small companies and the government could not afford to support the salaries and benefits of their workers.