Answer:
the quick and effective use of amour and air power
Explanation:
blitzkrieg crumpled Poland, France and Russia
As you know, Germany was an absolute mess after World War I. Citizens were starving, and thousands of Germans had lost their job. Adolf Hitler saw this as an opportunity to manipulate Germans into thinking it was the Jews who had caused all their troubles. People were desperate and hopeless. They need someone to tell them what to do, and how to fix this mess. They needed someone to tell them who to blame for their starvation and their losses. Adolf Hitler, unfortunately, rose up and became that person.
"First, I want you to starve.
Then I want you to lose your job.
Now you're looking for someone to blame?
That's when I step in and start to dictate."
Answer:
Explanation:
The frequency of natural disasters, especially in the form of floods and storms, has quintupled over the past 40 years, the elevated disaster risk being partly due to the effects of climate change. Developing countries bear a higher share of the adverse consequences of that increased risk.
Heightened disaster risk associated with poor management of the natural environment and human-induced climate change requires a long-term approach to reducing risk from natural events. Anintegratedandpreventiveframeworkembeddedinnationaldevelopmentstrategies would be most effective.
C. Avoid the problem of fighting Allied powers on two fronts; In more detail, the Schlieffen plan was the Imperial German plan to force a French surrender early in the case of a two front war with France and Russia. The plan stated that German troops should attack the French lowlands by marching through Belgium and advancing along the coast until the German units completed a pincer movement to the west of Paris, cutting off the main French force from their Capital. This was planned to be done in a few weeks, that way Germany could start an offensive against Russia before they could mobilize their army.
Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421 (1962), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case that ruled it is unconstitutional for state officials to compose an official school prayer and encourage its recitation in public schools.
