The correct answer is A. Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Explanation:
In a Post hoc ergo proper hoc fallacy the speaker considers one event is the cause of another because one event follows the other in time. This implies the speaker incorrectly assumes one event to be the cause of another without real evidence. This occurs in the example presented because the speaker thinks Jalessa being a President is the cause that the school was broken into. However, there is no evidence Jalessa is the direct cause of this event and this cannot be concluded based on the fact the incident occurred after Jalessa became the class president.
Answer:
Contrast
Explanation:
The relationship between the two sentences, "She took an entry-level position."
"She plans to manage the department next week" are Contrast.
This is because the two sentences show a contrast
Answer:
Brother you have picked your question from a excercise, and how could we answer when we have not readed the story, you should also tell us the story
Explanation:
<span>C. The innocent trust of childhood
</span>
