The reason why Bedouins were slow or unwilling to convert to Islam is that the Bedouins used to live in the desert harsh and extreme hot environment which made their natures harsh and unwilling to convert.
<h3 /><h3>What is Islam?</h3>
Islam is the religion of One God, the followers are called Muslims, they worship one God named Allah. Muhammad (peace be upon him) the messenger of God spread Islam and converted many, but Bedouins were not willing to change their religion, and were harsh at times.
Another reason for their unwillingness to convert was that they were illiterate and so had difficulties understanding the reality.
Bedouins were taught about Islam by the last prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). He tried to convert many but out of all Bedouins were the most reluctant to convert.
Learn more about Islam at brainly.com/question/27274805
#SPJ1
Answer:
What impact did the expansion of railroads in the West have on the American Indians who lived there? They were displaced from their tribal lands. They moved into towns and lived among the new settlers. They stopped farming and took jobs in factories.
Answer:
The federation was created by the United Kingdom in 1958 from most of the British West Indies. Britain intended that the Federation would shortly become a fully independent state, thus simultaneously satisfying the demands for independence from all the colonies in the region.
Explanation:
something like this.
Answer:
In “The Farewell Address,” George Washington describes religion and morality as the two indispensable pillars which support political prosperity. He then says that we should be cautious about the idea that morality can flourish without religion and concludes with the assertion:
"Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle."
There is considerable debate about the religious opinions of the founding fathers, including Washington. Whether he meant it or not, however, this statement is clearly false. There is no clear correlation between religious principles and national morality, let alone any good evidence that one causes the other. This would have been less clear two hundred years ago, since practically every nation had an established church, from which it was often difficult for many people to dissent publicly. Nonetheless, it is now clear that secular nations such as Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Belgium are sustained by a national morality at least as strong as any religious nation. These countries have low rates of crime and particularly of violent crime. They have enlightened, compassionate social policies which enjoy the support of the majority of citizens. Their presses are freer and their political systems less corrupt than the average in Europe, let alone worldwide. They conform in every material respect to the founding fathers’ notion of political prosperity.
