1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tatuchka [14]
3 years ago
11

during the enlightenment era, what did both ancients and moderns believe was a dependable guide to human thinking?

History
2 answers:
Katyanochek1 [597]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:    Reason

Explanation:  The Enlightenment era meant the rejection of the acceptance of knowledge on the basis of faith, and promoted reason as the basic criterion of cognition. This reflected not only the relationship to the Church but also the system of government, the scientific approach and the analysis of all phenomena in nature. Natural laws are not meant to reject religion, but to reject Church teaching, and religion was understood by reason and by study of the laws of nature. According to the Enlightenment, the laws of nature are those which people have dealt with, as present in nature and in society, and subject to reasonable analysis and examination.

SashulF [63]3 years ago
3 0
During the enlightenment era and also during the classical period major philosophers believed that a dependable guide to human thinking was reason and logic. By using reason and logic and also principles of humanism humans were capable of guiding their thinking effectively. 
You might be interested in
Which description of Alexander Hamilton is correct?
vova2212 [387]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
What is the purpose of the document of undelivered speech​
steposvetlana [31]

Answer: am not sure this is the answer but try it

Explanation:I seek no confrontation. I only pray and will strive for a genuine national reconciliation founded on justice.

I am prepared for the worst, and have decided against the advice of my mother, my spiritual adviser, many of my tested friends and a few of my most valued political mentors.

A death sentence awaits me. Two more subversion charges, both calling for death penalties, have been filed since I left three years ago and are now pending with the courts.

I could have opted to seek political asylum in America, but I feel it is my duty, as it is the duty of every Filipino, to suffer with his people especially in time of crisis.

I never sought nor have I been given assurances or promise of leniency by the regime. I return voluntarily armed only with a clear conscience and fortified in the faith that in the end justice will emerge triumphant.

According to Gandhi, the willing sacrifice of the innocent is the most powerful answer to insolent tyranny that has yet been conceived by God and man.

Three years ago when I left for an emergency heart bypass operation, I hoped and prayed that the rights and freedoms of our people would soon be restored, that living conditions would improve and that blood-letting would stop.

Rather than move forward, we have moved backward. The killings have increased, the economy has taken a turn for the worse and the human rights situation has deteriorated.

During the martial law period, the Supreme Court heard petitions for Habeas Corpus. It is most ironic, after martial law has allegedly been lifted, that the Supreme Court last April ruled it can no longer entertain petitions for Habeas Corpus for persons detained under a Presidential Commitment Order, which covers all so-called national security cases and which under present circumstances can cover almost anything.

The country is far advanced in her times of trouble. Economic, social and political problems bedevil the Filipino. These problems may be surmounted if we are united. But we can be united only if all the rights and freedoms enjoyed before September 21, 1972 are fully restored.

The Filipino asks for nothing more, but will surely accept nothing less, than all the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the 1935 Constitution—the most sacred legacies from the Founding Fathers.

Yes, the Filipino is patient, but there is a limit to his patience. Must we wait until that patience snaps?

The nation-wide rebellion is escalating and threatens to explode into a bloody revolution. There is a growing cadre of young Filipinos who have finally come to realize that freedom is never granted, it is taken. Must we relive the agonies and the blood-letting of the past that brought forth our Republic or can we sit down as brothers and sisters and discuss our differences with reason and goodwill?

I have often wondered how many disputes could have been settled easily had the disputants only dared to define their terms.

So as to leave no room for misunderstanding, I shall define my terms:

1. Six years ago, I was sentenced to die before a firing squad by a Military Tribunal whose jurisdiction I steadfastly refused to recognize. It is now time for the regime to decide. Order my IMMEDIATE EXECUTION OR SET ME FREE.

I was sentenced to die for allegedly being the leading communist leader. I am not a communist, never was and never will be.

2. National reconciliation and unity can be achieved but only with justice, including justice for our Muslim and Ifugao brothers. There can be no deal with a Dictator. No compromise with Dictatorship.

3. In a revolution there can really be no victors, only victims. We do not have to destroy in order to build.

4. Subversion stems from economic, social and political causes and will not be solved by purely military solutions; it can be curbed not with ever increasing repression but with a more equitable distribution of wealth, more democracy and more freedom, and

5. For the economy to get going once again, the workingman must be given his just and rightful share of his labor, and to the owners and managers must be restored the hope where there is so much uncertainty if not despair.

On one of the long corridors of Harvard University are carved in granite the words of Archibald Macleish:

“How shall freedom be defended? By arms when it is attacked by arms; by truth when it is attacked by lies; by democratic faith when it is attacked by authoritarian dogma. Always, and in the final act, by determination and faith.”

I return from exile and to an uncertain future with only determination and faith to offer—faith in our people and faith in God.

Basahin sa Filipino

4 0
3 years ago
What do you know about the state of affairs in Germany following the end of WWI?
victus00 [196]

Answer:

in short they sucked and they were loosing to get out of it they had to give alot pf things up .

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE HELP!!!!!
a_sh-v [17]
Ghettos are often know as being more impoverished/poor than other areas of the city. Ghetto is also more than likely toward darker races/black. This term was also used towards African Americans during that time.
8 0
3 years ago
¿Por qué es posible afirmar que la primera guerra mundial cambio la forma de percibir conflictos armados?
MA_775_DIABLO [31]

Answer:

FOUND an answer that  might help you

(this actually works btw)

https://brainly.lat/tarea/28284513#:~:text=Respuesta%3A%20Porque%20fue%20la%20primera,gases%20t%C3%B3xicos%20y%20agentes%20qu%C3%ADmicos.

Explanation:

but I'll just type what they said

USername: kh4364582

Answer:

"Because it was the first war that featured innovative technological advances. Thanks to mechanized weapons, the powers were able to perfect and design weapons of great destructive capacity. One of the innovations was weapons made with toxic gases and chemical agents. There was also a modernization in the artillery and transport systems, for the first time they used airplanes. This genre that the war was even more crude than others, since there are new weapons that can be too lethal, so the casualties must have been many."

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Select definition of anarchy
    10·1 answer
  • Who created the big stick deplimocy?
    8·1 answer
  • The area of the United States that was most effected by brown v board of education was
    5·1 answer
  • In which rebellion in india in the mid-1800s did natives challenge British <br> power
    11·1 answer
  • All of the following contribute to a high risk of famine in Africa except
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following is an incorrect pairing of a pre-world war i nation and its post-war name
    12·1 answer
  • Michael Jackson Comprehension Questions.
    10·1 answer
  • How were van eyck and durer different?
    11·2 answers
  • Help please!!! How do I get a grade up by 5% in a week?
    11·2 answers
  • Italians supported Mussolini because:
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!