1. Timespan
2. Plots (events that make up the story and what leads up to the resolution)
3. Conflict complexity
Why? Well, see below!
Short stories and novels are very different, and they vary in many different categories that make up why they’re called what they’re called. One difference between these two is the timespans set. In short stories, the timespan tends to be very short because as mentioned, it is a short story. The plot is kept simple, and a short solution to a problem is identified and put into action. The next difference is plot (and subplots). Plots are a huge difference between these two because in a short story, little capacity of description is provided, whereas in a novel, the plot is described more in depth. It typically is more reasonable to read a novel because the plot familiarizes itself with the reader, which results in a better comprehension of how the problem is brought about and solved. The final difference is conflict complexity. This is a big difference as well between novels and short stories because in a novel, the conflict is less timely and more descriptive. The protagonist may often encounter more conundrums in the path of solving one, which would make the general conflict more difficult to solve. If you need extra help, let me know and I will gladly assist you.
Answer:
Choices
Explanation:
Due to limited resources in a our wold, people have to make do with choices because it is nearly impossible to have all what we want.
The two main problems in economics revolves round:
Limited resources
Unlimited wants
The cost of choosing one item over another and forgoing it is called the opportunity cost.
Choices are often made by drawing up a scale of preference from which the most pressing needs can first be attended to.
If there are enough resources, there wouldn't be a need to make choices when demanding for certain goods and services.
Answer:
I got you.
Explanation:
1- The correct answer is A. Clovis people disappeared because they overhunted the big animals that were their food source.
The correct answer is:
The Senate could prevent the President's nominee from serving as a federal judge, if they refuse to confirm the President's nominee.
Explanation:
Under Article II, of the United States Constitution; the President has the power to elect candidates for Supreme Court Judges, but it also states that the Senate shall advice and consent the President's decision.
Before the President can officially present his nominee, he has to follow certain steps that involve sessions in which the nominee should present and answer questions from the Senate's Judiciary Committee. The Committee acts as a Representative Committee for the whole Senate, and if they approve (three-fifths are required), they send their vote to the entire Senate, this confirmation allows the President to appoint the nominee for federal judge.
