It's not a matter of justified or not; morals had little to do with European exploration. Most of the shortcomings of European exploration were due to a lack of understanding of the native people and a lack of diplomatic relations, a term which natives were unable to comprehend. If I had to answer, European exploration was justified since there was no reason NOT to explore the far reaches of the unknown and because Europeans were civil and did not seek to mass murder every native they found. They had no idea that their diseases would be so devastating since medical history hadn't gone that far. From their point of view, they didn't think natives were civilized and yet attempted friendly relations anyway.
Answer:
<em>The most powerful of these states was the Songhai Empire, which expanded rapidly beginning with king Sonni Ali in the 1460s. By 1500, it had risen to stretch from <u>Cameroon</u> to the Maghreb, the largest state in African history.</em>
Answer:
New Amsterdam
Explanation:
In 1647, the most successful of the Dutch Director Generals arrived in New Amsterdam. Peter Stuyvesant found New Netherland in disarray.
Sagot:
Ang sagot ay tila B: Gumawa ng mabuti at iwasan ang kasamaan
Gawin ang mga bagay na nagpapasaya sa iyo
Mangyaring sabihin sa akin kung ito ay gumana, kailangan kong gumamit ng isang online translator ngunit umaasa akong makakatulong ito!
Enlightenment and Industrial Revolution are the times when Rational thinking and believing based on facts started to occur and it collided with the superstition thinking that once become the basis of truth and knowledge for centuries. These events started to revolutionize the new way of thinking of men and society into proving things based on facts and not on assumptions.
