Answer:
D. supply increased and quantity demanded increased.
Explanation:
When supply curve moved from s to s1 , supply increased . demand curve did not move . Then the new equilibrium will shift towards the lower price with demand also showing increasing trend to balance supply but at lower price.
If I'm correct-- by outdoor advertising do you mean commercials and ads encouraging people to go outside?
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Will the court rule in support of Daniel’s argument that Nintendo breached the warranty based on reasonable expectation on the performance of an expensive system and statements made while selling the gaming system?
Rule: There is a creation of express warranty when a seller makes a description of the statement quality, condition or performance of goods sold. This warranty is created by the statement of facts and if the seller uses words to designate the value of the supposed goods, it will only be considered as an opinion that does not create any express warranty.
The customer’s reasonable expectation of the existence of the gaming system based on the price leads to implied warranty. The goods sold should be logically fit for the general purpose for which it is sold. It should be of proper quality to satisfy the implied warranty of merchantability and the goods should fit the particular purpose for which the buyer will use the goods to satisfy the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
Analysis: Here, the argument of Daniel that Nintendo’s description of the gaming system as “most reliable”, and “durable” asserted that the quality and performance of the gaming system will not stay because these words create general statements that are made as part of sale or seller’s opinion about the goods. These words would be considered as puffery and do not create any express warranty. The higher price of the gaming system would create an implied warranty about the performance of the system, but the switch failed only after the warranty period. When the seller has expressly stated the warranty period as one year, any defects that occur after the warranty period will not breach the implied warranty.
Moreover, the gaming system was reasonably fit for Daniel’s business purpose and worked well during the warranty period. Hence Daniel’s arguments will not stay in front of the court.
Conclusion: The court will not rule in favor of Daniel and Daniel will not be able to recover against Nintendo because no breach of warranty had occurred.
Answer:
B. 26,000, 24,000.
Explanation:
Stock Company
Equivalent units
Particulars Units % of Completion Equivalent Units
Mat. Conversion Mat. Conversion
Transferred Out 23000 100 100 23000 23000
<u>Ending WIP 3000 100 331/3% 3000 999.9= 1000</u>
<u>Total Equivalent units 26000 24000</u>
<u />
The Equivalent units can be calculated either by adding the units transferred out and ending WIP or by adding beginning WIP and units started.
Equivalent units for materials 26000
and Equivalent units for conversion are: 24000
Answer:
An implied agreement is based on a formal agreement.
Explanation:
A contract can be defined as an agreement between two or more parties (group of people) which gives rise to a mutual legal obligation or enforceable by law.
There are different types of contract in business and these includes: fixed-price contract, cost-plus contract, bilateral contract, implied contract, unilateral contract, adhesion contract, unconscionable contract, option contract, express contract, executory contract, etc.
Mutual assent is a legal term which represents an agreement by both parties to a contract. When two parties to a contract both have an understanding of the parameters, terms and conditions surrounding a contract, it ultimately implies that they are in agreement; this is generally referred to as mutual assent.
Simply stated, mutual assent connotes agreement, acceptance and consent to a contract by both parties.
An implied contract can be defined as an informal contract that exists based on an assumption or understanding between two or more parties, rather than on terms that are formally and specifically defined.
This ultimately implies that, an implied agreement is not based on a formal agreement but on assumptions or understanding between the parties involved.
