The argument that James is making in this speech kings are god’s representatives on earth and should not be challenged. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is the argument?</h3>
Generally, the argument is simply defined as a hot or furious discourse of opposing or divergent viewpoints.
In conclusion, In this lecture, James argues that monarchs are god's ambassadors on Earth and should not be disputed.
Read more about the argument
brainly.com/question/9860191
#SPJ1
The Spanish Requirement of 1513 (Requerimiento) was a declaration by the Spanish monarchy, written by the Council of Castile jurist Juan López de Palacios Rubios, of Castile's divinely ordained right to take possession of the territories of the New World and to subjugate, exploit and, when necessary, to fight the native inhabitants.
The Requerimiento (Spanish for "requirement" as in "demand") was read in Castilian<span>[citation needed]</span> to Native Americans to inform them of Spain’s rights to conquest. Those who subsequently resisted conquest were considered to harbor evil intentions.<span>[citation needed]</span> The Spaniards thus considered those who resisted as defying God’s plan, and so used Catholic theology to justify their conquest
Nixon and Wallace took advantage of the rising discontent among the conservatives and positioned themselves as defenders of property rights. The increasing level of violent protests had served to aggravate equal feelings against the civil right movements especially among conservative supporters.
