Answer:
C alternative would yield the lowest total cost for an expected annual volume of 111 boats
Explanation:
The computation of each alternatives are shown below:
A (new location)
Fixed cost $310,000
Variable cost ($400 × 111 boats) $44,400
Transportation cost $5,300
Total cost $359,700
B (subcontract)
Fixed cost $0
Variable cost ($3,200 × 111 boats)$355,200
Transportation cost $32,000
Total cost $387,200
C (expand existing facilities)
Fixed cost $74,000
Variable cost ($1,200 × 111 boats) $133,200
Transportation cost $88,000
Total cost $295,200
Out of these, the alternative C has the lowest total cost
Answer:
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) - which President Obama signed into law on February 17th, 2009 - was an unprecedented action to stimulate the economy. It included measures to modernize our nation's energy and communication infrastructure and enhance energy independence.
Explanation:
Answer:
I use coffee daily. The supply for the coffee I bought (Colombian Coffee) is few then the price is expensive. As the price is expensive I can only buy 2 pounds of this item per month. My demand is affected for the price that producers set to this coffee. I would like to buy more but then the supply of this product is limited therefore the prices will always be high.
Answer:
b. 300,000 shares being sold is an issuer transaction and the 200,000 shares being sold is a non-issuer transaction.
Explanation:
A non-issuer transaction is a transaction that does not directly benefit an issuer or it was not directly executed to benefit an issuer.
According to the Uniform State Law, an entity involved in the sales of certificates of interest, leases, mining titles among others is officially exempted from being labelled as an issuer. Hence, the entity (officers of the firm) in the question are non-issuer brokers.
Specifically, when the sales of stock are carried out by someone or an individual who is not a registered stockbroker, that individual officially becomes what is called 'a non-issuer broker-dealer'. The implication is that such a transaction is to be exempted from the registration requirements of the Security Exchange Commission.
In this question, since the issuer newly issued 300,000 shares while the remaining 200,000 in the proposed combination was offered by Officers of the firm - non-issuer broker-dealers. The Law states that it must be separated to show that 300,000 shares are sold in an issuer transaction (Primary) directly involving an official issuer while 200,000 shares are sold in a non-issuer transaction (Secondary).
