The dilemma is to decide whether to ignore mother's orders or comply with them in this situation.
<h3>What is Opportunity Cost?</h3>
Opportunity Cost refers to the losses incurred on leaving the other possible alternatives in the decision making and choosing the one. It is the value of the best alternative choose in the process of the decision making.
In the Above situation,the individual would enjoy with friends if he goes to watch the movie However it can lead to trouble with his mother.
However, if individual does cleaning of the lawn; the price would be the fun you would have to forgo.
The best course of action would be to obey your mother because the consequences of doing otherwise are much worse.
Learn more about Opportunity Cost here:
brainly.com/question/12121515
#SPJ1
Answer:
The answer to the question is customer- initiated touch point
Explanation:
In Hank Brigman's submission a touch point is the meeting point between customers and the organization in order to share vital information,negotiate business or zeal up a transaction.
When interaction is initiated by the customer, it is known as customer-initiated touch point.This is sometimes made possible by referrals from those customers who have made use of the product in the time past or due to a brand loyalty a product or service commands among its rival products or services.
Answer:
Option A. The U.S. Constitution.
Explanation:
The reason is that the US constitution provides the basic framework for the laws to be formulated and passed both in the US National Assembly and the Senate. The laws cannot be formulated if the US constitution doesn't allows the passing of the law which means that the constitution must be amended first. When the slavery was to be eliminated in 1865, the first problem was that passing the elimination of slavery law was inconflict with the US constitution. So the constitution was amended before passing the law to eliminate the conflict.
In the nutshell, every law originates because of different reasons like Technological reasons, Social reasons, Cultural reason, etc) but the basis remains the same which is US constitution which is the basic framework for passing the law.
Answer:
Invalid
Explanation:
Since it is stated in the will, that upon his death should the assets be transferred, it means that Silvia doesn't get anything until Mr Jacob ceases to be alive.
With the new development as regards Mr Jacob living for 6 more months before dying, Silvia has no assets yet and as such cannot transfer anything to Jacob Jnr.
Cheers
If i had to answer i would say C or D. (: