The correct answer is D. Baron de Montesquieu.
Explanation
Charles Louis de Secondat, lord of la Brède and baron de Montesquieu (1689 - 1755) was a French philosopher who stood out for his ideas related to the intellectual and cultural movement of the Enlightenment. His works focused on the theory of separation of powers, which has been introduced in many constitutions around the world. His most famous work on the division of powers was his treatise "On the Spirit of the Laws" in which he states that in antiquity the functions of the State (necessary for the protection of the citizen) were monopolized in a single entity, which usually associates with despotism. Therefore, he proposes to distribute public powers among different entities, which limit each other, avoiding the monopolization of power in a single person or entity. So, the correct answer is D. Baron de Montesquieu.
Answer: Created a new form of government that included a cabnit and put the emperor in charge.
Explanation:
The abolition of the feudal system and all feudal class privileges.
The enacting of a constitution and formalization of a parliamentary system of government.
The formation of a national army.
The adoption of universal education.
There are some more things that might help, hope this was helpful! :)
Any women who could read or write would be able to be trained as a physician.
The effects that WWI had on Germany was that they lost allies and suffered huge territorial losses giving away its land and population to Poland, Russia, France, Belgium, and Denmark, and ultimately had to sign the Treaty of Versailles. After the U.S involvement in the first World War it lead directly to the Great Depression and WWII, The Treaty of Versailles led to a system where the U.S was cashing in its wartime loans to the U.K which in turn was using the wartime reparations it received from Germany to pay off the U.S.
Bolivar hated the fact that political appointees who exercised power were appointed directly by the royalty without taking into consideration the views, or the agenda of the local population, and without involving their vote and voice at all.