Thank you for posting your question here. It can be considered to be consistent with the given facts. As you know, an hypothesis, much less a theory, is never proven. It can be shown to be consistent with given observations. As new observations are collected, the given hypothesis may have to be modified.
If the celery became crisp when it was soaked in ice water, then clearly that the water has rehydrated the celery is a reasonable hypothesis. But did it have to be ice cold water? Would room temperature water work? What about boiling water?
And thus most of the time, the success of an hypothesis leads to the design of new experiments to test and expand the original hypothesis.
Its becuase plants dont grow every where its only in certain rows
Objectivity when studying sociology and society in general can have the following drawbacks:
1. Objectivity does not guarantee valid findings- When researching a social phenomenon, if a researcher is objective in his approach, operating on fixed-answer questions and predetermined research questions, he will likely miss out on in-depth and comprehensive answers or explanations to his questions.
2. Objectivity is not possible for all social phenomena since some phenomena or social processes are simply not quantifiable.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
d.Feeling disgust and disappointment, she says "I’m not hungry."
Esther was polite in her response to her mother´s new dish.
