Explanation:
In simpler words, the multi-part question is asking for you to first analyze the three sources, then pick a side and have knowledge to defend your point on the question 'to what extent should nations pursue their national interests'.
In source 1, it shows that the majority of Canadians are opposed to sending troops to Afghanistan, with 36% voting for, 5% unsure, and 59% voting against.
Source two is clearly depicting the nazi's, at a rally held in Nuremberg. Although the source does not state if the protesters are pro or against Nazi regime, I am assuming they are pro. This would lead to the assumption that the people of Nuremberg are pro-Nazi empire.
The source 3 is a timeline, that goes from 1920 to 2005. This time period is very significant, because it captures many important battles, such as world war 2, Persian Gulf War, and the Iraq invasion.
After reading these three sources, you must decide if you think it is good for nations to pursue their national interests, or bad.
Hope this long explanation helped clarify the troubling question for you!
John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie were crucial platers in the modernization and development of the U.S economy. Although their monopolies devoured their field of business and caused suffering for many under their rule, the lessons we learned on how to limit business has been crucial to the survival of our nation. It is due to the businesses they made and the lesson they taught that we should celebrated them as ambitious “Captains of Industry”
I hope this helps! :)
D: Vinson act increased the strength of the US navy by 20%
Answer:
The most important goal was the establishment of the nation series. We hope that there will be no other major conflict. One of his goals was to end World War One, and he attempted to achieve this by creating 14 points. Global peace was essential to him, and this was the bulk of his efforts during his presidency.
By getting rid of harsh policies and confucianism.
