Answer:
“They were conscious that they were not as other animals.”
“If they worked hard, at least they worked for themselves.”
“All animals were equal.”
Explanation:
You didn't include the entire question and the passage but I'm assuming this is the same one as that below:
None of the old dreams had been abandoned. The Republic of the Animals which Major had foretold, when the green fields of England should be untrodden by human feet, was still believed in. Some day it was coming: it might not be soon, it might not be with in the lifetime of any animal now living, but still it was coming.
. . . It might be that their lives were hard and that not all of their hopes had been fulfilled; but they were conscious that they were not as other animals. If they went hungry, it was not from feeding tyrannical human beings; if they worked hard, at least they worked for themselves. No creature among them went upon two legs. No creature called any other creature “Master.” All animals were equal.
–Animal Farm,
George Orwell
Answer:
Humans are more likely to believe something if it’s part of a compelling story.
Explanation:
What advice I would give to him/her is to go see someone that can help them with their weight or to go on a diet and exercise.
Answer:
The setting of "The hound of the Baskervilles" is a swamp. This contributes to bring a sense of mystery and suspense in the story, since a swamp is a remote environment and difficult to visualize, facilitating a crime to occur without raising suspicions and without the presence of witnesses. A different scenario would have removed this suspense and unpredictability in history.
Explanation:
"The hound of the Baskervilles" is one of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's novels that has Sherlock Holmes as a spectacular detective. In this novel, Holmes has to solve the mystery surrounding the death of Sir Charles Baskerville, an English millionaire who was found dead in a swamp. Everyone believes that Baskerville was killed by a violent dog that has plagued the region for a long time, but Holmes ends up finding clues that the millionaire's death story does not hold the dog to blame.
Good Summaries objectively restate the thesis and crucial details.
