Huh ? Is that a question ?
Because of increasing sea ice.
In climate change taking place since then, there has been an opposite problem. Beginning in the late 19th century, a reduction of sea ice has been progressing in the Arctic regions. The pace of ice mass loss has been accelerating especially since the 1970s. In the first decade of the 21st century, Greenland's ice loss accelerated at a rate of 30 gigatonnes a year.
Answer:
1. No chief executive made a lack of federal order
2. No national court system meant that problems among states couldn't be fixed
3. <span>any amendments to the Articles must be approved by all 13 states which made it nearly impossible to make any changes</span>
What am I supposed to be answering?
Based on my knowledge, the scramble for Africa was largely because the industrial revolution was springing up all over the world in largely European countries and they were at a point where resources were running out. Gold and other valuable metals were discovered in Africa as well as timber. The surplus of resources in Africa made it very valuable to these industrial countries so they all made a huge "scramble" to Africa. Also, the idea of merchantilism, the idea that the amount of land a country owned defined its wealth, was still very popular so these countries wanted to make a huge land grab.
