Answer:
The real phrase is: But with each word that she was attracting more and more in herself, so he abandoned him and only the dead dream continued to struggle as the afternoon slipped away.
Explanation:
The tone used is resignation, recognition of what was happening at that crucial moment.
I would say D but i am not sure let me know if thats right
The statement "The Cyclops is compared to a mast, or flagpole, because of his size" best explains the simile in this excerpt.
<h3>What is a simile?</h3>
A simile may be defined as a type of figure of speech that involves the comparison of one thing with another thing of a dissimilar kind. In other words, it resembles two, unlike things that are usually presented by like or as.
The options under this question are described below:
- The Cyclops is compared to Zeus because of his size.
- The Cyclops is compared to Zeus because of his power.
- The Cyclops is compared to a mast, or flagpole, because of his surrender.
- The Cyclops is compared to a mast, or flagpole, because of his size.
The comparison signifies that even spread down the cyclops stood out among his sheep like a mast accomplishes at sea. In the first two options, the cyclops are not compared to Zeus at any point.
Therefore, the correct option for this question is D.
To learn more about Simile, refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/273941
#SPJ1
Answer:
The professors asked Gloria Pritchett and me to give a guest lecture at the university.
Explanation:
This sentence is grammatically correct because it does have the right use of grammar here. The second option isn't grammatically correct because you cannot say Gloria Pritchett and me because it isn't the right way to use the grammar. It's just incorrect.
Answer:
The March on Washington helped create a new national understanding of the problems of racial and economic injustice. For one, it brought together demonstrators from around the country to share their respective encounters with labor discrimination and state-sponsored racism.
Explanation:
The March on Washington helped create a new national understanding of the problems of racial and economic injustice. For one, it brought together demonstrators from around the country to share their respective encounters with labor discrimination and state-sponsored racism. With activists from New York City, the Mississippi Delta, or Cambridge, Md., all describing their various encounters with police brutality, labor discrimination, or housing deterioration, it became very difficult to cast racial segregation as an exclusively Southern problem.
Through the mass participation of organized labor, students, religious leaders, and un-unionized domestic workers, the march also re-articulated for national and international audiences the extent to which racism and economic exploitation remained intertwined. In a planning document co-authored by Bayard Rustin, the march's chief organizers explained that, "integration in the fields of education, housing, transportation, and public accommodations will be of limited extent and duration so long as fundamental economic inequality along racial lines persists." The ability of over 200,000 marchers to organizer under such a message—peacefully and with such forceful spokespeople as Martin Luther King, Jr.—forced party politicians and more moderate political operators to respect the ability of the American Left to make clearly stated demands and generate mass support. In addition, the march helped to provide local activists with the moral authority to push back against less progressive forces in their respective home states, making 1963 a critical year, and the march itself a critical event in the transformation of local political regimes around the country.
