This question is about the article "What is Freedom?" by Jerald M. Jellison and John H. Harvey
Answer and Explanation:
1. The authors conclude that freedom means, for people, the ability to make choices. That's because they are always defining freedom as the ability to make their own decisions, to go where they want, to do what they are planning, to think for themselves, to make their own decisions, among other things always related to choices.
2. An example of denial is presented in the text, when the authors show that even though people see freedom as the ability to make choices, they do not feel free, when the options of choice are not attractive and do not seem to benefit by feeling so oppressed and forced to choose something bad. With that, we can conclude that people reframe the sense of freedom and affirm that bad feelings and negative effects are not freedoms.
Answer:
The prince's thought shows that it is not possible to pay a life with another life, that is, he shows that killing Romeo will not pay the debt for Mercutio's death, besides that whoever kills Romeo, will have the same debt as him.
Explanation:
When the prince asks "Who now the price of his dear blood doth owe?" he is showing that Mercutio's life is priceless, nothing will make Romeo pay for this life and neither Romeo nor anyone can bring Mercutio back, that is, it is useless to kill Romeo and turn another citizen of the city into a murderer. Therefore, the best punishment is to exile Romeo and let him suffer the consequences of his own actions.
You can write a draft of ideas you have for an essay, making sure that all ideas are presented, and you can make a chart of how you want something to be presented, i.e. what will be in the introduction, what will be in the body and what will be in the conclusion. You can also plan out how you want the reader to see it. Sometimes in films they show something happening and then say "48 hours earlier" or something. It gives the reader an idea that you actually thought about how you want the story to be told. When you organize writing it's always important to have an open mind about what you're talking about. You can't have a narrow topic that you can't talk a lot about, you need ideas first.
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
"How does a comparison of Maui and his brothers create a comical tone in the passage
?
One of the most common stories of Maui found throughout Polynesia is related to how he pulled up islands from the ocean floor. There are several versions of this fable applied to different islands depending on their natural make-up. For instance in Hawai’i Maui pulled up the islands by tricking his brothers into paddling their canoe with all their might to haul up each island which he had hooked using a great and magical fish hook called Manaiakalani, telling them it was a massive fish. He repeats this trick for each island.
"
Answer:
The passage shows us a comic tone showing how Maiu was smart in deceiving his brothers.
Explanation:
The excerpt manages to add a comical tone to the narrative because we can see how Maiu tricked his brothers so that they could do the heavy lifting of the activity that Maiu himself wanted to do. This "deception" shows a small joke between brothers that makes reading funny and allows the reader to perceive a comical tone, making the narrative more fun.
